Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alabama Nuclear Reactor, Partly Built, to Be Finished

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 05:24 AM
Original message
Alabama Nuclear Reactor, Partly Built, to Be Finished
The directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority unanimously approved a plan on Thursday to finish the partly built Bellefonte 1 nuclear reactor, a project on which the authority spent billions of dollars in the 1970s and ’80s but dropped in 1988 because of cost overruns and declining estimates of power demand.

The revived reactor, in Hollywood, Ala., is not expected to be completed before 2018 to 2020 — or about a half-century after the project was first announced, and following nearly a quarter-century of limbo.

“The T.V.A, has wrestled with the fate of Bellefonte since 1988,” said Marilyn A. Brown, a board member who is a professor of energy policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology’s School of Public Policy. The decision comes at a time when other countries, Germany and Switzerland, for example, are leaning away from nuclear power and closing older plants, after the meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex in Japan in March.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/19/science/earth/19nuclear.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bunch of idiots on that board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll repeat what you said
bunch of fucking idiots on that board, I took the liberty to add a new meaning to what you said.
The last thing we need is more nuclear power plant, now or ever. I suspect this is going to be dropped before its finished with ratepayers taking the brunt of the cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder if they are going to use the same "half a century" old design?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or how much of the existing construction is going to have to be demolished...
then rebuilt from scratch. Betcha' it's not going to cost a penny less than $12 billion.

How many solar panels and windmills can you buy with $12 billion? How many jobs would be created for manufacturers and installers? How much should be spent on developing the "smart grid" for the entire TVA service area? I could go on for days with all the (better) alternative ways to spend this money.

Solar is way beyond being economically competitive with the TRUE cost of nuclear right now, wind costs about 25%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Build new "zero energy" homes!
Put some carpenters to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6.  Alabama has made immigrants "illegal", so I guess they have to hire locally now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Geez, that would really suck.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. They're pretty much stuck with it.
Edited on Fri Aug-19-11 09:27 AM by FBaggins
Oh, there will be some incremental improvements in some key areas and they obviously don't need to install decades-old computers (etc), but the basic design needs to fit the structure that's already there.

Note that they're finishing up a similar project at their Watts Bar facility in the next year or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, 'cause my stepfather didnt' come home all stressed one day....
"They want to put the plumbing right through the core".

Civilian scientists and engineers can imagine enough ways to fuck up a nuclear plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PamW Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. 104 going on 106, if memory serves..
Edited on Sat Aug-20-11 04:08 PM by PamW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Brilliant...
Edited on Mon Aug-22-11 04:25 PM by SpoonFed
they should finish this old reactor and then never turn it on...
instead they can use it like the fire department uses special training buildings...

to train telerobotic operators how to use nuke filth cleanup high tech equipment
to train local mayors and citizens groups how to turn over their neighbourhood topsoil
to train the local fire department how not to get lethal doses and die within 14 days of the disaster
to train the power company to give tours to the locals to win over support other than through deceptive lies at local town halls
to teach the local concrete suppliers how to actual build the required sarcophogae
to run practise fire drills of 95% evacuations within 5 hours to the local populus

they can have a full, to-scale practise disaster park... this would be a real boon to the economy there
and once everybody is totally cool with routine, they can just turn it on and wait...

for the inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Except that this unit is unlike any other reactor in the U.S. mix
Not much training value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They shall reap what they sow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC