Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Start-Up in California Plans to Capture Lithium (from geothermal plants)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:57 AM
Original message
Start-Up in California Plans to Capture Lithium (from geothermal plants)
A start-up company will announce on Wednesday that it is beginning commercial operations at a factory in Southern California to capture lithium from existing geothermal energy plants, a technology it says has the potential to turn the United States into a major lithium exporter.

The plant, built by Simbol Materials near the Salton Sea in the Imperial Valley, will also capture manganese and zinc.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/business/energy-environment/simbol-materials-plans-to-extract-lithium-from-geothermal-plants.html
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Smart way to do it.
> The only American lithium producer, Chemetall Foote, in Clayton Valley, Nev.,
> makes the material by pumping brine into ponds and waiting months for the water
> to evaporate. Two other companies have announced plans to produce lithium in
> Nevada using the more conventional method of evaporation.
>
> Simbol officials say they have developed a proprietary filtering process that
> takes minutes and will be located on piping that is a minor detour for brine
> that the geothermal energy company is pumping anyway. Costs are low enough to
> compete in the world market, company officials say, and environmental impacts
> are small since the geothermal plant is already in operation.

Smarter & safer. Here's hoping that their projected costs are low enough to
beat the more polluting alternatives.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC