Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British researcher pushed wind, solar, & hydro to replace coal - 146 years ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:19 AM
Original message
British researcher pushed wind, solar, & hydro to replace coal - 146 years ago
Edited on Fri Oct-07-11 10:20 AM by wtmusic
One of the most prescient works on energy ever published, The Coal Question's impetus was economics rather than environmentalism. But its relevance to today's challenges is mind-boggling:


"The Coal Question; An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal Mines (1865) was a book by economist William Stanley Jevons that explored the implications of Britain's reliance on coal. Given that coal was a finite, non-renewable energy resource, Jevons raised the question of sustainability. "Are we wise," he asked rhetorically, "in allowing the commerce of this country to rise beyond the point at which we can long maintain it?" His central thesis was that the UK's supremacy over global affairs was transitory, given the finite nature of its primary energy resource. In propounding this thesis, Jevons covered a range of issues central to sustainability, including limits to growth, overpopulation, overshoot,<1> energy return on energy input (EROEI), taxation of energy resources, renewable energy alternatives, and resource peaking — a subject widely discussed today under the rubric of peak oil.

<>

"Jevons considered the feasibility of alternative energy sources, foreshadowing modern debates on the subject. Regarding wind and tidal forces, he explained that such sources of intermittent power could be made more useful if the energy were stored, for example by pumping water to a height for subsequent use as hydro power. He reviewed biomass, namely timber, and commented that forests covering all of the UK could not supply energy equal to the current coal production. He also mentioned possibilities for geothermal and solar power, pointing out that if these sources did become useful, the UK would lose its competitive advantages in global industry.

"Regarding electricity, which he pointed out was not an energy source but a means of energy distribution, Jevons noted that hydroelectric power was feasible but that reservoirs would face the problem of silt build-up. He discounted hydrogen generation as a means of electricity storage and distribution, calculating that the energy density of hydrogen would never make it practical. He predicted that steam would remain the most efficient means of generating electricity.

<>

"Jevons held that despite the desirability of reducing coal consumption, the outlook for implementing significant constraints was dim. Still, the UK's prosperity should at least be seen as imposing responsibilities on the current generation. In particular, Jevons proposed applying the current wealth to righting social ills and to creating a more just society:

We must begin to allow that we can do today what we cannot so well do tomorrow....Reflection will show that we ought not to think of interfering with the free use of the material wealth which Providence has placed at our disposal, but that our duties wholly consist in the earnest and wise application of it. We may spend it on the one hand in increased luxury and ostentation and corruption, and we shall be blamed. We may spend it on the other hand in raising the social and moral condition of the people, and in reducing the burdens of future generations. Even if our successors be less happily placed than ourselves they will not then blame us."

"Jevons also articulated several social ills that particularly concerned him:

The ignorance, improvidence, and brutish drunkenness of our lower working classes must be dispelled by a general system of education, which may effect for a future generation what is hopeless for the present generation. One preparatory and indispensable measure, however, is a far more general restriction on the employment of children in manufacture. At present it may almost be said to be profitable to breed little slaves and put them to labour early, so as to get earnings out of them before they have a will of their own. A worse premium upon improvidence and future wretchedness could not be imagined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coal_Question
Refresh | +6 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, what a find! K&R&B
Will have to read the whole thing (in my ample free time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. That is really remarkable
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DocMac Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was he killed? Or old age?
I'll take killed for a thousand Alex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. The first gasoline/electric hybrid car was patented in 1906.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. This site says 1898, the 1906 is the first American Patent
Edited on Sun Oct-09-11 01:05 AM by happyslug
http://www.hybridcars.com/history/history-of-hybrid-vehicles.html

One of the problems with early US car makers was a Patent lawyer had patented the concept of the automobile and demanded that anyone making cars had to pay the lawyer. Henry Ford ended up fighting that lawyer and winning, the concept you can NOT patent an IDEA came out of that case. Thus it was hard to patent any cars before Ford's attack on that Patent.

More on that lawsuit, filed in 1905, final decision in 1911 (The Court ordered the person who held the Patent to produce a car to those patents within five years, no such car was ever produced).

http://www.fi.edu/learn/case-files/ford/favor.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Licensed_Automobile_Manufacturers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_B._Selden

The lawyer's name was George B Seldon, whose Patent was made in 1895 and then sold to the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers which covered ELECTRIC Automobiles in addition to gasoline Automobiles. Thus the Patent covered both gasoline AND electric Automobiles. Thus no American Patents on anything automotive till after that issue was resolved in 1911.

More on early hybrids:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_electric_vehicle#History
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R for Jevons. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC