Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

International Scientists and Economists Statement on Biofuels and Land Use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:17 AM
Original message
International Scientists and Economists Statement on Biofuels and Land Use
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/forest_solutions/EU-ILUC-Letter.html

International Scientists and Economists Statement on Biofuels and Land Use

A letter to the European Commission

When land used for food or feed production is turned over to growing biofuel crops, agriculture has to expand elsewhere. This often results in new deforestation and destruction of other ecosystems, particularly in tropical regions in the developing world.

The resulting heat-trapping emissions from clearing new land can be significant and may outweigh any emissions savings from the use of biofuels.

Numerous scientific studies have warned about the unintended climate consequences of the indirect land use changes associated with increased demand for biofuels and the need to address the issue by changing existing biofuel policies.

Over 150 scientists and economists with Ph.D.s and expertise related to climate, energy, and land use have signed on to the International Scientists and Economists Statement on Biofuels and Land Use to urge the European Commission to recognize and account for indirect land use change impacts as a part of the lifecycle analyses of heat-trapping emissions from biofuels.

Many of the signers of the International letter were part of letters to the Environmental Protection Agency (PDF) and the California Air Resources Board (PDF) arguing that these bodies should include the impacts of indirect land use change emissions in biofuels policies for the United States and California. In both of cases the final regulations accounted for these indirect emissions.

Last Revised: 10/07/11

Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC