Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TEPCO retracts criticality call

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 05:14 AM
Original message
TEPCO retracts criticality call
The operator of the Fukushima nuclear power plant has retracted an earlier assessment that a continuous nuclear reaction, or a criticality, could have taken place in the damaged Number 2 reactor.

The Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, said on Thursday that the small amount of xenon-135 it detected in gas taken from the reactor's containment vessel was the result of the spontaneous nuclear fission of radioactive curium-242 and -244. The two substances are contained in nuclear fuel.

The amount of xenon-135 detected almost matched the amount that would have been produced if the radioactive curium in the fuel had undergone spontaneous fission. TEPCO says a criticality event would have resulted in higher levels of xenon concentration.

Spontaneous fission refers to the nuclear fission of radioactive materials other than uranium, and it does not lead to criticality. Such fission is said to occur constantly.The earlier detection of small amounts of Xenon-135 had suggested the possibility of a criticality occurrence in the melted fuel in the damaged reactor.


http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/03_19.html


A couple errors in the reporting, but still worth the read.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. TEPCO Press Release
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11110309-e.html
· We found a possibility to detect short-half-life radionuclide such as
Xe-133 and Xe-135 according to our radionuclide analysis sampled on
November 1 by the gas management system of the reactor containment
vessel of Unit 2. We continued to monitor the temperature, pressure and
data from monitoring post and there was no significant fluctuation from
those data. As we can't be denied a possibility of fission reactions,
we decided to start injecting boric acid water from reactor feed water
system at 2:48 am on November 2 and stopped it at 3:47 pm on the same
day. At around 7:20 pm on the same day, Japan Atomic Energy Agency
evaluated that the TEPCO's analysis result of the short-half-life
radionuclide such as Xe-133 and Xe-135 detection was valid. We consider
that they were generated by the spontaneous fission on the grounds that
the concentration of detected short-half-like radionuclide (Xe-135) is
low, that short-half-like radionuclide (Xe-135) was detected even after
the boric acid, which stops nuclear fission chain reactions, was
injected, and that the parameters of the reactor were not significantly
changed.
· At 10:00 am on November 3, we started transferring accumulated water
from the basement of the Unit 6 turbine building to temporary storage
tanks.
· At 12:40 pm on November 3, we started the work to install an additional
flow meter into the nitrogen gas injection line into Unit 2 to improve
the reliability of the nitrogen injection. It was finished at 2:00 pm
on the same day, For this work the nitrogen injection was suspended for
approximately 10 minutes, however, there were no significant changes in
the parameters of Unit 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interesting that they didn't immediately question the lack of other signs of fission
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 11:44 AM by FBaggins
Seems that we've seen this happen half a dozen times already. They identify (occasionally in error) an isotope that has a short enough half-life that it hints that fission may have occurred recently... but the scenario always lacks all the other expected signs of ongoing fission. Which, of course, never keeps the usual suspects from leaping to the inevitable "See? Now... NOW... I'm finally right!!!" (as if this would have demonstrated that even had it actually occured as first suspected) .

It only further complicates things that the reporting hardly ever gets the science right and people have a tough time distinguishing between a brief intermittent criticality (a big deal if you're standing over an open reactor, but otherwise not very significant) and the resumption of an actual ongoing self-sustaining fission (far FAR more significant).

They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. One would hope that they would hold off on speculation/announcement until they could analyze how much Xenon there was... and how that compared to other possible explanations. But even the short delay in the report that WAS made just got their hand smacked again for waiting too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It seems to me like they acted prudently
We see undeniable evidence of fission, so…

As for getting the story right, well… that’s why I like to get as close to a primary source as I can (e.g. TEPCO press releases)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When something is not an immediate safety concern, "accurate" is more important than "quick"
They got plenty of things wrong in the other direction (when it WAS potentially a safety issue), so they probably overcompensate now. ("They" not being restricted to TEPCO, but also to government and pseudo-governmental agencies).

And as I said, even this accelerated-but-incomplete reporting was criticized by the government for delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC