Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Italian cold fusion machine passes another test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 03:49 PM
Original message
Italian cold fusion machine passes another test
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45153076/ns/technology_and_science-science/

Italian cold fusion machine passes another test

Despite a world of skepticism about E-Cat and other devices, proof is adding up

By Natalie Wolchover

Italian physicist and inventor Andrea Rossi has conducted a public demonstration of his "cold fusion" machine, the E-Cat, at the University of Bologna, showing that a small amount of input energy drives an unexplained reaction between atoms of hydrogen and nickel that leads to a large outpouring of energy, more than 10 times what was put in.



But the experimentalists who have seemingly demonstrated cold fusion over the years have been unable to explain the underlying mechanism that drives the miraculous reaction they claim to observe, and so the scientific community has largely turned its back on this line of research. Most physicists — as well as the United States Department of Energy (DoE), academic journals, and the U.S. Patent Office — consider cold fusion machines to be hoaxes, because they say physics rules out the possibility of room-temperature nuclear fusion.

Life's Little Mysteries http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/newest-cold-fusion-machine-does-impossible-1584/">reported on the E-Cat machine in April, when Rossi and fellow physicist Sergio Focardi successfully demonstrated the device for a group of Swedish physicists. At the time, we explained that the Italian physicists are two of a handful of researchers around the world who have kept the cold fusion fire burning. These cold fusion devotees believe that there is a little-understood physical process occurring in their machines that produces a safe, clean and endlessly renewable form of energy.

The physicists who were invited to the demonstration in April gave the E-Cat a solid thumbs-up. It produced too much excess heat to have been originating from a chemical process, they wrote in http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess">their report, adding that, "The only alternative explanation is that there is some kind of a nuclear process that gives rise to the measured energy production."

Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure hope it works perfectly
Because if it doesn't, I'm sure the scientists involved will be dragged into an Italian court to face charges of getting everybody's hopes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Have you ever driven a Fiat?
Nuff said. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah!
"Fix It Again, Tony!" we used to call them in the Seventies.

In any case, my reference was to the court case against the seismologists, in case anybody missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not very far.
They like to do what this experiment claims. Get hot. As in, burn up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. actually that new mini fiat is a blast to drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starboard Tack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. As was the original Fiat 500. Cheap, economical and disposable.
I bought a used one in Rome in 1971 for $20, drove it all over Europe for a year. 60+mpg and 60mph cruising speed. Never had to see Tony with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Ever shot a Benelli
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. No, but I shot one of their cousins
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Horse Puckie
Italian scientists Andrea Rossi and Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna announced that they developed a cold fusion device capable of producing 12,400 W of heat power with an input of just 400 W. Last Friday, the scientists held a private invitation press conference in Bologna, attended by about 50 people, where they demonstrated what they claim is a nickel-hydrogen fusion reactor. Further, the scientists say that the reactor is well beyond the research phase; they plan to start shipping commercial devices within the next three months and start mass production by the end of 2011.



If this all sounds fishy to you, it should.

The Italian scientists, like Pons and Fleischmann, skipped the typical route of publishing their study and results in a peer-reviewed science journal, instead taking it directly to the press and public. This is a strong sign of pseudoscience, and smacks of a mistake, if not an outright hoax.

In many ways cold fusion is similar to http://www.skepdic.com/perpetual.html">perpetual motion machines. The principles defy the laws of physics, but that doesn’t stop people from periodically claiming to have invented or discovered one.

http://news.discovery.com/tech/cold-fusion-claims-resurface.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. This is not completely true
Edited on Sat Nov-05-11 06:30 PM by OKIsItJustMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. One thing I've learned from reading here in the E/E forum is if it isn't fission RC don't like it
would you say I'm correct on that RC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Apparently you haven't read most of my posts.
My main interest are the sciences, as they have to do with Facts and Truth. I try to look at the big picture, what causes the effect. Doing 'What If' to better understand why things happen the way they do.
You, on the other hand seem to have a problem with that, as you take one result, one time, that fit into your mind set, that only applied to one thing due to special circumstances and try to apply it to everything else, whether it fits or not, while ignoring everything that does not fit your mind set.
Nuclear is a danger is only because it is relatively new and so much energy is involved in such small space. Plus we have only started to learned how to harness that energy. Give us another hundred years. For instance, look at the last hundred hears in electronics, for comparison. We could find even our airplanes nuclear powered in the next hundred years.
Most of us learn from our mistakes. That is how we learn, to advance. Nuclear power is here to stay, whether you like it or not. We need it. Nothing else can come close to supplying our energy needs when the oil runs out. Not Wind. Not Solar, Not Renewable's. In the long run they will only be niche energy sources.

Now stop following me around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm tired of playing 'find the bulshit', can somebody else do it this time please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. "Proof is adding up."
Possibly not invalidating the research, but showing the writer is a moron, and anything goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Try unplugging it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually, they reportedly did just that
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. John Galt's machine has been found
Civilization is saved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. From the University of Bologna - how appropriate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. They've been doing business at the same stand
for 900 years, so it's not exactly Phoenix University.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. "Some kind of nuclear process". Hope they wore their lead-lined boxer shorts
If a nuclear reaction of some sort is taking place, shouldn't it be relatively easy to verify by simply measuring for radiation spikes?

Also, wasn't that one of the arguments that destroyed the first cold fusion reports, that the researchers would have been killed by radiation if their device had operated as they claimed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Aren't you getting things mixed up
fission and fusion is two different animals best I can figure out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Both are nuclear reactions, and both release radiation
Fusion, while it doesn't leave behind much of any radioactive waste compared to fission, releases massive amounts of radiation as the atoms fuse together.

Even Pons, in his initial cold fusion experiment, claimed to have detected some radiation release (mainly in the form of neutrons, IIRC). One argument I've read to debunk the claim of cold fusion is that to generate the amount of energy required to melt a hole in the floor of Pon's lab (which he claimed his device did overnight), you'd need so much energy radiating out of the apparatus that you'd kill anyone who came into the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. 'One argument I've read' is the basis for this claim
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. What do you find funny?
http://www.wesleyan.edu/synthesis/GROUP4/FINALVERSIONS/fusion.html

"Many holes have been found in Pons' and Fleischmann's experiment which shows that they probably did not achieve fusion, not commercially viable fusion in any event. First, the amount of heat measured in their experiment was billions of times greater than would be accounted for by Deuterium fusion. If the heat that they recorded was produced by Deuterium fusion, so many neutrons would also have been produced that they would both have been killed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. I blame the faster-than-light neutrinos (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC