Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuclear Power Goes Rogue: Here’s what’s at stake.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:30 AM
Original message
Nuclear Power Goes Rogue: Here’s what’s at stake.
"So what’s driving the world’s nuclear suppliers to service such nuclear pariahs?
First and foremost: cash."

"avoiding another Fukushima-like accident will be an ever greater challenge. But this challenge will be minor compared with the test of preventing a nuclear-arms race in the Middle and Far East."

Excellent article should be read in full.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/11/27/post-fukushima-nuclear-power-changes-latitudes.html

Nuclear Power Goes Rogue
Nov 28, 2011 12:00 AM EST
Post-Fukushima, the market for nuclear power is changing latitudes. Here’s what’s at stake.

<snip>

None of these nuclear customers, it should be noted, has a nuclear-safety regulatory system worthy of the name. Nor, outside of Pakistan, do any of them have enough trained technicians to build or operate large nuclear-power programs. More than a few—Turkey, Syria, Iran, Algeria, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia—have either toyed with or actually developed nuclear-weapons options. (And, of course, Pakistan actually has nuclear weapons.) And Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia have refused repeated American requests that they forgo making nuclear fuel—a process that can bring states within weeks of acquiring nuclear weapons. Besides Iran, Egypt, Algeria, and Syria have been caught violating International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards.

So what’s driving the world’s nuclear suppliers to service such nuclear pariahs?

First and foremost: cash.

<snip>

The second driver is geopolitics.

<snip>

The Obama administration, which heralded these conditions as a new gold standard when the U.A.E. deal was finalized, now has a different take: it wants nothing to do with this legislation. The Saudis, meanwhile, have hired the Pillsbury law firm, one of Washington’s top lobbying guns, to secure a U.S. nuclear cooperative agreement free of these conditions.

<snip>

Henry Sokolski is executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center in Arlington, Virginia, and is editor of Nuclear Power’s Global Expansion: Weighing Its Costs and Risks (2010) and The Next Arms Race (forthcoming).


Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought Obama was supposed to be the great non-proliferator arms-control guy.
His position here is incomprehensible.

snip from the article>

And the ones the Saudis like most are American-designed. This makes securing a U.S. cooperative agreement desirable. Senior Obama officials justify striking a deal not primarily for industrial but for nonproliferation reasons. Their line of thinking is reminiscent of 18th-century British arguments for staying in the slave trade to control it, and it might be credible but for one detail: their boss, President Obama, is currently opposing proposed legislation that would tighten nonproliferation requirements for U.S. nuclear cooperation.

snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That was Candidate Obama, not President Obama.
Yet again, the problem isn't with the principle, it is with the
implementation by morally corrupt individuals.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is a very good read. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC