Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pak army has liberty to hit back at Nato attacks: Kayani (LBN xpost)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 10:33 AM
Original message
Pak army has liberty to hit back at Nato attacks: Kayani (LBN xpost)
From LBN:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x5077471

Pak army has liberty to hit back at Nato attacks: Kayani
Source: Hindustan Times

Pakistan Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani on Friday gave his troops "full liberty" to respond to any further cross-border attacks by Nato forces in Afghanistan in the wake of an air strike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, official sources said.

The powerful army chief told commanders of units deployed along the western border with Afghanistan that they had "full liberty of action to respond (by) employing all capabilities" available at their disposal, the sources said.

Kayani was quoted by the sources as saying that there should be "no ambiguity in the rules of engagement for everyone down the chain of command" if they faced an attack by Nato forces.

Such an action would "require no clearance at any level" and the army would "provide resources as required on ground", he was quoted as saying.

Read more: http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/Pakistan/Pak-army-has-liberty-to-hit-back-at-Nato-attacks-Kayani/Article1-776847.aspx


Anti-science pro-nukes have claimed that nuclear proliferation is good because no country would never attack another country which has nuclear weapons. This has already been proven wrong a number of times, but anti-science pro-nukes don't learn from history.

Recently we've seen NATO attack Pakistan, a country which has nuclear weapons.
So Pakistans nuclear weapons have not prevented them from being attacked.
Anti-science pro-nukes are proven wrong again.

Now Pakistan has authorized "full liberty of action to respond (by) employing all capabilities" and "require no clearance at any level".
Does that include nuclear weapons? Is there some ambiguity about this?
Kayani was quoted by the sources as saying that there should be "no ambiguity in the rules of engagement for everyone down the chain of command" if they faced an attack by Nato forces.

Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, some would say we've seen Pakistan attack NATO, too.
There is some discussion over what really happened in that "NATO" attack, which is why the usual "friendly fire" apologies are not forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe
And some are saying that NATO got played by the Taliban...which doesn't exactly speak well of HUMINT gathering.

Regardless, this doesn't bode well for either side...because in the long term, it'll be the Taliban and its supporters who win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Time will tell. I will wager there is much we do not know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC