"I was surprised when a white glow covered the table," Bowers said. "The quantum dots were supposed to emit blue light, but instead they were giving off a beautiful white glow."
Then Bowers and another student got the idea to stir the dots into polyurethane and coat a blue LED light bulb with the mix. The lumpy bulb wasn't pretty, but it produced white light similar to a regular light bulb.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9777070/Now the article is a bit hyped. When they say this:
LEDs produce twice as much light as a regular 60 watt bulb and burn for over 50,000 hours. The Department of Energy estimates LED lighting could reduce U.S. energy consumption for lighting by 29 percent by 2025. LEDs don't emit heat, so they're also more energy efficient. And they're much harder to break.
...they neglect to mention that LEDs as currently produced are NOT more power efficient than compact flourescents. They will someday be -- which is why the DOE estimates 2025. Whether this development helps them achieve superior efficiency is not elaborated on. So don't rush around trying to find LED lighting just yet.
Even in their current state, LEDs do have some compelling advantages -- when the proper control electronics are used, LED arrays can be made to change their light warmth and hue (as well as just dimming.) That allows for advanced lighting systems that can be used for mood enhancement and respond to room occupants.
And they are more durable and have the potential to be extremely cheap to fabricate, with very little environmental impact from disposal.
Just so you have the whole story.
Personally, I'm wondering whether the quantum dot technology would be applicable to improving the performance of this omnidirectional light receiver/concentrator concept that reflouresces at a solar-cell-freindly wavelength and bottles the resulting light to concentrate it at the end of a light-box:
http://www.solgel.com/articles/Sept01/ren_solar.htm...cool stuff. 3M's had a patent on the basic concept since the 70's.