Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

bu$h didn't even mention the environment in the SOTU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:34 AM
Original message
bu$h didn't even mention the environment in the SOTU
I guess he's giving up even the illusion of giving a damn. Why are our people not hammering him on this? It's a freebie! I believe it was in LCV that I read that 85% of americans consider themselves environmentalist. While that number is certainly deceptive(just because you say you're "for" the environment doesn't necessarily translate into reality), we've surely got a stick to beat him with that can't easily be parried.
Do the Democrats fear pissing of their own coporate supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God he didn't.
Every time he proposes another environmental initiative you just know Mother Nature is about to be raped once more. "Clear Skies" softened anti-pollution regulations and allows polluters to pour more toxins into the environment. "Healthy Forests" turns the stewardship of our timber resources over to his asshole buddies in the logging industry. I'm not sure what name he has given his proposal to allow higher arsenic levels in our drinking water while permitting industry to pump more industrial waste into our rivers and streams. Probably something along the lines of "Pure Water".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I noticed that - not a single word
Though as 2dumb2b noted, maybe just as well.

He doesn't give a shit about the issue and this speech was just another signal that he doesn't.

Don't worry, though - I'm sure that, come late April, he'll put on his work gloves and khaki slacks and stand next to some trees as a demonstration of his sincere desire to win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. He has nothing to brag about, nothing to campaign on
when it comes to the environment. He obviously doesn't give a shit about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Come to think of it . . . .
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 06:34 PM by hatrack
He didn't say a single word about AIDS/HIV or Africa, his highly touted foray into compassionativity from last year's SOTU.

Sex slaves, another popular topic one year ago, were also absent.

He also didn't say a single thing about agriculture, except for in passing: " . . . to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers, and farmers . . . " while praising his own record on "free and fair trade." Quick! Look! There it went - the word "farmers". That was fast.

Here's the sum total of his comments on energy policy: "Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run - so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy." Gosh, George, sounds great! How shall we accomplish that?

The hydrogen car apparently had trouble getting out of the garage and into the speech.

In addition, neither the Moon or Mars appeared over the Capitol. I guess that particular trial balloon leaked and sank without much of a sound after last week's heavily promoted "visionary" speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissenting_Prole Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. He did use the word "energy"....once
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does not surprise me.
Bush does not know shit about the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC