It's good news if you're affluent enough to be a homeowner in Vermont; though installing solar in any part of the country will help. But it's a small slice of a big, ugly pie. And rental property owners won't do diddly until the jackbooted thugs from Big Gummint come along and put a gun to their heads and threaten to confiscate their very balls.
I hope that the "spike" Jim Grundy spoke of is, in the long-run, just the initial blip on an overall improvement in energy generation and consumption. Right now, the situation ISN'T encouraging. Even after six or seven years of renewed attention to energy issues, less than 2% of our energy is decentralizable/renewable, the nuclear industry is hated (and stalled), and the Saudi oil industry is unable increase their output.
Then, there are also the problems of the unmaintainability of sprawl-based community planning, mass production of low-value disposable consumer goods, and motorcar-based transportation systems. No energy generation plan will be able to change the fact that these are long-term disasters waiting to happen.
These stories can give us a sense that progress is being made and hope is still alive, but such projects tend to be very small, and the problem is enormous. They're "proof of concept". How can we prove and implement the concept of compelling our business and political communities to encourage capitalizing and building durable, sustainable energy sources? It's been hard enough for
Julian Darley and Richard Heinberg to simply "start the conversation" about relocalization. Which "tipping point" do we tip first? We needed to do this 25 years ago, and we didn't.
At this point, we're riding the tiger, and we've set ourselves up -- not just in the USA, but around the world -- for real trouble. The Big Project is still ahead of us.
--p!