Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Inaction May Push Climate Talks For 2012 Plan Into 2010 - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:11 PM
Original message
Bush Inaction May Push Climate Talks For 2012 Plan Into 2010 - Reuters
OSLO, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Talks on extending a U.N.-led fight against global warming beyond 2012 may last until 2010 to allow a wider U.S. role after President George W. Bush steps down, a U.N. expert said on Wednesday. Many environmentalists, and some governments, want a new pact on cutting greenhouse emissions agreed by 2008 to give businesses and investors time to adapt to new rules after the U.N. Kyoto Protocol's first period ends in 2012.

"I sense in the rhetoric that people are talking more about 2009 (than 2008)", said Michael Zammit Cutajar, a climate expert from Malta who leads a U.N. group looking at how to extend Kyoto. "We need a deal that includes Kyoto and includes the United States," he told Reuters during a conference in Oslo on capturing carbon dioxide emissions. "I wouldn't be surprised, given the U.S. electoral calendar, if the overall deal would be 2010," he said. The United States is the main source of greenhouse gas emissions, mainly from fossil fuels burned in power plants, factories and cars.

EDIT

He said U.S. involvement in capping emissions could also encourage big developing nations, such as China or India, to look at ways to brake the rise of their emissions. No countries are proposing developing nations adopt Kyoto-style caps on their emissions from 2012, he said.

He said the Nairobi talks would also look at proposals for forests to be planted or preserved from logging as part of a fight against global warming. Plants soak carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, as they grow.

EDIT/END

By all means, let's talk a while longer. After all, what's another four or five years at this point? We certainly wouldn't rush into anything that might be economically unfair, now would we?

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=L11778418&WTmodLoc=World-R5-Alertnet-4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC