Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arctic Melt May Dry Out US West Coast - New Scientist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:02 AM
Original message
Arctic Melt May Dry Out US West Coast - New Scientist
Cities and towns along the west coast of the US could be suffering from a serious water shortage by 2050, thanks to global warming. As Arctic sea ice melts, annual rainfall may drop by as much as 30 per cent from Seattle to Los Angeles, and inland as far as the Rocky Mountains.

As temperatures rise over the next 50 years, the area of Arctic sea ice is predicted to shrink by as much as 50 per cent in some areas during the summer. To find out what this would mean for climate, Jacob Sewall and Lisa Cirbus Sloan from the University of California at Santa Cruz first used a climate model to work out how sea ice cover was likely to change through the rest of the year.

Then they took these values for sea ice cover and the resulting sea surface temperatures, and plugged those into a global climate model to see which areas of the world would be most affected. While Europe got off quite lightly, they found that the sea ice changes are likely to mean significantly fewer storms will pass over the west coast of the US.

EDIT

Towers of warm air form above areas where sea ice has been lost, and that disturbs the flow of air in the atmosphere around them, "like the supports under a bridge alter the flow of water in a river." In their model Sewall and Cirbus Sloan found that such towers formed between Norway and Greenland, deflecting winter storms that would otherwise have passed over the west coast of the US towards northern British Columbia and southern Alaska. These areas received six per cent more rain, while southern British Columbia down to southern California suffered a 30 per cent drop. The researchers will publish their results in a future issue of Geophysical Research Letters. "Given that water resources in this region are currently stretched close to their limit, a 30 per cent drop would have a serious impact," says Sewall."

EDIT

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994856
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. In the Greenland Ice Cap Melting Threads
other posters have pointed out that fairly recent stories from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute have theorized that increased fresh water melt at high latitutes may lead to severe disruptions in the thermohalene circulation, particularly in the North Atlantic, but elsewhere as well. The disruptions are thought to possibly cutting off the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic drift, leading to serious cooling in the North Atlantic, and IIRC, adjoining arctic areas north of Canada, Greenland, Iceland and Scandinavia. Perhaps that's why Europe gets off quite lightly in the model used, according to the article. It would be more helpful if the article were more explicit on that point.

Nonetheless, this is very bad news. If there is sufficient energy from a useable source available at that time, I would imagine that there would be a call to construct diversions into the Saskachewan River and perhaps the Columbia basins from Eastern British Columbia for agricultural purposes. The western U.S., though, sounds like it will become toast, literally. I wonder just how far east the toaster will go.


Amanda

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Their sea current models are still primitive
You can't make climate predictions about coastal areas without sophisticated ocean modeling, and the current models thay have are very primitive.

I'd say it'll be 5 years before they start getting what the need to make these predictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC