Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: California's low-carb fuel move

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 02:39 PM
Original message
Analysis: California's low-carb fuel move
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/19376.html

By CHRIS KILLIAN In an unprecedented move that California state officials hope will set an example on how the U.S. -- and even the world -- can reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the state announced it would reduce carbon emissions by 10 percent by 2020 by targeting polluting transportation fuels.

The Low Carbon Fuel Standard was unveiled Tuesday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and seeks an aggressive, comprehensive approach to significantly reducing the amount of greenhouse gas emissions in a state that is the world's 12th largest producer of the emissions -- a significant cause of global warming.

It also creates the world's first global warming standard for transportation fuels.

Actual implementation of the plan won't begin until 2010, after a long process where state environmental and energy commissions assess what are the best alternative forms of energy to meet the goals outlined in the LCFS.

<much more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. The way California is hoping to meet these goals
is by sequestering carbon from coal and LNG power plants, including in saline aquifers and other underground formations. They're also talking about using the CO2 for enhanced oil recovery.

There's also wind, solar, geothermal, and 3 nukes proposed, but I'm worried that it's sort of a greenwashing effort; most of the solar sites are just a few megawatts, while the proposed coal sites are hundreds of megawatts. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC