Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Living Lightly on the Grid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:35 AM
Original message
WP: Living Lightly on the Grid
Mike Tidwell's electric meter was spinning in reverse.

He was standing outside his Takoma Park house watching the metal disk count down. "I'm selling it to Pepco right now," he said one day recently.

Tidwell, an environmental activist concerned with climate change, has outfitted his home with energy-efficient appliances, a corn-burning stove and solar panels. Now, the two-story house sometimes produces more electricity than it needs and sends the surplus to Pepco's distribution system.

Across the Washington area, homeowners alarmed about utility rates and greenhouse gases are seeking to slash their power use or produce their own energy from renewable sources. Among them, Tidwell and a handful of others have succeeded in creating homes that require only minimal energy from power plants and fossil fuels.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/05/AR2007030501493.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Solar panels with grid intertie should be REQUIRED on ALL new
home construction, and for all new business construction, too.

If you want grid hookups you should have to be a power generator, too.

It's time to get serious about energy independence - we either WANT it or we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes it should...
it's already standard in the UK.

Too bad so much of our congress is so sold out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Err, no, it's not
There's absolutely nothing like that even proposed. They're not even enforcing old energy efficiency standards properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes there is, actually.
I was probably wrong that it's already required in all areas, but I know some cities are requiring it actually, yes... nationally I'm sure it's a phased-in program. Also, the program includes lots more than just requiring solar panels.

But yes... it was proposed years ago, actually. The deadline for all new homes to be completely carbon-neutral is 2016, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ah, I was wrong about the proposal - it was proposed in December 2006
and the consultation phase ended today. Nothing has been decided yet.

Zero carbon homes do not widely exist at the moment but there are some aspiring to a carbon neutral life dotted around, either home to pioneering environmentalists or architects. There is also a development in South London, BedZed, created for the Peabody Trust Housing Association, which has 82 homes designed as zero carbon. The development was finished in 2001/2 but there have problems with its zero carbon status reported since, meaning extra power has had to be used to heat it and provide energy.

A semi-detached house in St Albans, Hertfordshire, has been billed as Britain's greenest house, with wind turbine, a roof covered with grass-like plants to keep heat in and other environmentally friendly measures. However, even this £140,000 project has not made claims to being a zero carbon property
...
In a bold pronouncement, Gordon Brown said that he aimed for all new homes built in ten years time to be zero carbon properties. To achieve this developers will have to buy into the idea in a big way. Problems with achieving this lie in the high cost of building these homes compared to traditional properties, at a time when the high cost of land eats into profits.
...
After releasing only a few cryptic sentences in the Pre-Budget Report last week, the Treasury says that Mr Brown will unveil more details about carbon zero homes in the full budget next year. Until then, don't expect developers to rush to build zero carbon homes, and even after that it is likely that a lot more incentives will be needed to get all new homes on the green track.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/mortgages/article.html?in_article_id=415463&in_page_id=8


There's a prototype to be unveiled soon; and London has plans to build 1,000 homes by 2010; but this is all still "we'd love to do this in the future" stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Argh... dammit!
x(

Figures!

Mea culpa... I should have guessed it's still be 'planning', but I could have sworn this was proposed in 2004.

Also, it has been done in some city.. at least one... I have to be remembering that correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That sounds good to me! Setting aside global warming for pollution reduction alone it should be done
People are sickened and have died because of pollution. Studies have shown how it causes asthma and even heart attacks! So for that alone this should be done. Then add in global climate change and peak oil and we *really* need this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. WP does not even say how many kW*hour/month they use
I am having a hard time figuring if we are doing well. We use 380kW*hour/month for two of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC