Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Utility Stocks Surprisingly Pleased With SCOTUS Decision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:08 PM
Original message
Utility Stocks Surprisingly Pleased With SCOTUS Decision
Some embedded links in the original article.

http://blogs.wsj.com/energy/2007/04/02/utility-stocks-surprisingly-pleased-with-scotus-decision/

Utility Stocks Surprisingly Pleased With SCOTUS Decision

Earlier, Energy Roundup noted that Bloomberg and venture capitalist Paul Kedrosky warned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Massachusetts vs. EPA would be bad news for utilities with coal-fired plants, as it seemed to make federal regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions more likely.

Somebody forgot to give the message to investors of utilities with coal-fired plants. Shares of American Electric Power and Southern are each up more than 1% today. Shares of Duke Energy, which lost in another Supreme Court environmental case today, are up 2%.

So what gives? Stanford Group analyst Christine Tezak says the ruling will, in fact, have no effect on utilities. “While this is an important moral victory for proponents of greenhouse-gas regulation, we do not believe it has meaningfully changed the pace of legislative resolution that will be needed to craft a national program, which will eventually cap and later reduce greenhouse-gas emissions from utilities, the transportation sector and industrial sources,” she writes in a note to clients.

And Sanford Bernstein analyst Hugh Wynne points out that new regulations forcing utilities to offset or cut greenhouse-gas emissions could be, at worst, neutral for regulated utilities such as Duke, AEP and Southern because they are allowed to pass such costs directly to the consumer. They’re also allowed to get a return on their invested capital — including environmental upgrades to their plants — so their earnings can actually rise as a result of regulations. Wynne owns Duke shares, and Sanford Bernstein owns shares of AEP.

– Mark Gongloff

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention that they've already factored climate change . . .
Into their business plans and are not so easily spooked as they might be had they been holding out hope that Bushian madness on the topic had any future at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. even investors have to live on the same planet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC