Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The greenhouse gas emission trading scam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:31 AM
Original message
The greenhouse gas emission trading scam
And the overall upshot of such legal compliance? Many, many greenhouse gas emitters would have an awful lot of collective credits to peddle to greenhouse emitters who find it desirable to put off their own compliance -- at least in the near term. And because of the surfeit of these tradable credits among entities complying with the law, there would be little or no incentive for a lot of compliers to go beyond what they would have done anyway to achieve compliance, because this would flood an already crowded market and reduce the value of salable credits even further.

A greenhouse gas credit trading system is guaranteed to work wonderfully from the perspective of having a lot of credits traded, allowing its proponents to claim great success. The fact that a compliance buyout system (which is what an emissions trading system should really be called) works against rapid reduction of greenhouse gas emissions will be buried in fuzzy numbers and free market blather for years.

Emission trading schemes are an intellectual fraud. They contradict what every sensible person understands intuitively. Their widespread acceptance is the product of the short-term interests of powerful groups, free market fetishism run amok, and cunning “dare to think new ways” Wall Street sales talk.

People who really care about cutting greenhouse gas emissions who buy into this intellectual fraud are contributing directly or indirectly to delaying meaningful greenhouse limiting standards. Which is another way of saying they are working against the interests of the natural environment they purport to support.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1877.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sbyte Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Trading implies brokerage fee's.
Brokers/financial intuitions  have incentive to back this
plan.  I imagine Morgan Stanly likes it, as well as Lehman
Biro's. But wait a minute Doesn't Al Gore also heads a
financial institution called "Blood and Gore". 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC