Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

India rejects greenhouse gas limits - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:40 AM
Original message
India rejects greenhouse gas limits - AFP
Source: Agence France-Presse

India rejects greenhouse gas limits

1 hour, 56 minutes ago

NEW DELHI (AFP) - India said Monday it would reject proposals to limit
greenhouse gas emissions at a summit meeting of the world's leading
economies next month because stricter limits would slow its booming
economy.

"Legally mandated measures for reducing greenhouse gas emissions are
likely to have significant adverse impacts on GDP growth of developing
countries, including India," environment ministry secretary Pradipto
Ghosh said.

"This in turn will have serious implications for our poverty alleviation
programmes," he said. "Legal mandates on greenhouse gas mitigation in
any form will impact our growth, and this is not the path we wish to
pursue."

-snip-

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070528/sc_afp/g8climateindia_070528124306
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're also close allies with Iran.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-India_relations

As if that matters. It's been said global warming will melt the polar ice caps and due to their sea level, India will be drowned in time.

They also ban sex ed, claiming it goes against their culture. Gee, will there be any of them left to practice their culture if they all give each other a deadly disease?! (Actually, it's only 5.7 million; in a land of 1.5 billion, their government has no reason to care. Rather following in the footsteps of Reagan...)


In short, whatever. So much is said one day and so much is counter-said the next day; all one can really do is wait and see where the eddies and currents of the market take us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobster Martini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deja Vu All Over Again
Where else have I heard the argument that reducing greenhouse gas emissions would hurt the economy? Oh, right! Our President!

George W. Bush, 2005: "Kyoto would have wrecked our economy.”

COPENHAGEN, Denmark - U.S. President George W. Bush said in a Danish TV interview aired Thursday that adhering to the Kyoto treaty on climate change would have "wrecked" the U.S. economy, and called U.S. dependence on Middle East oil a national security problem.

"We're hooked on oil from the Middle East, which is a national security problem and an economic security problem," Bush said in the interview with the Danish Broadcasting Corp. recorded Wednesday at the White House. Bush is to visit Denmark next week before going to a G-8 summit in Scotland.

He said the United States is looking for ways to "diversify away from fossil fuels," but defended his decision not to adhere to the Kyoto Protocol, which commits industrial nations to cut emissions of greenhouse gases.

"Kyoto would have wrecked our economy. I couldn't in good faith have signed Kyoto," Bush said, noting that the treaty didn't require other "big polluters" such as India and China to cut emissions.

<snip>

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8422343/


Thanks for the leadership, junior. Where’s that sparrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. India could help relieve its poverty by encouraging one and two children
families. And educating women. And valuing girls.

The U.S. won't do much until India and China agree to do something, which seems out of the question at this time.

Ironically, India and China are both and will both experience problems in their agricultural sectors due higher temperatures, lower rainfall, melting glaciers, and, especially in India's case, disruption of the monsoons.

If the three would all agree to act together, the world would be better off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. what India and the rest of the moron* world fail to understand
regardless of whatever kind of "booming" economy they have, it will mean nothing in a few years unless something is done.

It's like these stupid ass nations* (read the USA) are in a race to out stupid each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC