Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The mysterious world of Pakistan's Dr Strangelove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 08:54 PM
Original message
The mysterious world of Pakistan's Dr Strangelove
By Jan McGirk
07 February 2004

"The whole point of the doomsday machine is lost ... if you keep it a secret," ranted Dr Strangelove in Stanley Kubrick's dark, satirical film four decades ago. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the newly disgraced father of Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme, seems to have taken this advice to heart, blithely distributing nuclear secrets and components over a period of many years to Iran, Libya and North Korea. But the full extent of his largesse and the full explanation for it remain matters of urgent doubt.

This week's televised humbling of Dr Khan transfixed Pakistani viewers in much the same way as the unveiling of the Hutton report gripped Britain. Like Hutton, it has left many people wondering precisely how much of the truth remains untold. Following weeks of rumours and speculation, Dr Khan admitted on Wednesday's evening news to decades of systematic leaking, right under the noses of MI6 and the CIA, not to mention Pakistan's own all-seeing military spies, the ISI (InterServices Intelligence Agency).

(snip)

After graduating from Karachi University, he moved to Europe for further studies. In the early 1970s, he found a job at a uranium enrichment plant in the Netherlands run by the British-Dutch-German consortium Urenco. In 1976, he left in a hurry for Pakistan.

He was subsequently convicted in absentia by a Dutch court of attempted espionage relating to Urenco's centrifuge blueprints and sentenced to four years in prison, only for the judgment to be overturned on appeal. Yet Dr Khan had returned to Pakistan with enough knowledge to set in motion what had hitherto been considered beyond the nation's reach: a nuclear weapons programme.

much more...
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/story.jsp?story=488765
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. USA has also tries to "hush up" this matter...
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/482667.cms

India, US disagree on Khan-Mush episode
CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA

TIMES NEWS NETWORK< SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 07, 2004 09:06:25 PM >


WASHINGTON: The United States and India, despite their famed strategic partnership of late, are disagreeing publicly on Pakistan .
Abdul Qadeer Khan

While New Delhi says Pakistan's nuclear shenanigans exposed over the past few weeks are not the country's internal matter and needs international scrutiny and discussion, Washington is backing Islamabad in quickly putting a lid on the whole issue.


Secretary of State Colin Powell said on Friday that Washington's primary goal was containing proliferation and busting Khan and his network had met that goal.


As for accountability and pardoning issues , Powell asserted that it was a matter between Khan, who he pointed out is a Pakistani citizen, and his government....





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC