Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: Iran's new political landscape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
democratic Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 01:54 PM
Original message
Analysis: Iran's new political landscape
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3476193.stm

Analysis: Iran's new political landscape

By Sadeq Saba
BBC regional analyst

Visitors to Iran these days can't fail to notice a change in the atmosphere of the place.

Close-fitting coats are replacing the black chador
Twenty-five years on from the Islamic revolution, young girls on the streets of Tehran have abandoned their black chadors in favour of tight-fitting coats and designer sunglasses.

Few government agents seem inclined to enforce the Islamic Republic's moral code any more.

Iran Air no longer warns passengers flying into Tehran about the need to adhere to a strict dress code.

Restaurants have started admitting women who are "improperly" dressed and alcoholic drinks are readily available on the black market.

In recent months, ecstasy tablets have also become popular with the young. Men and women now mix together more freely than ever before.

Teenagers pack into Western-style coffee shops in the evenings, and sex before marriage is becoming more acceptable.

Frustration

There has also been a radical change in the political atmosphere.

Young voters were key to Khatami's election in 1998
Six years after President Khatami swept to power in a landslide election victory, there is a widespread feeling of disillusionment with the reformist cause.

The frustration is particularly evident amongst young Iranians, who make up more than two-thirds of the population.

Most despise the Islamic regime but are no longer prepared to risk violence to change it. They are content to get what enjoyment they can from life and to keep out of the way.

For the conservatives - who never had much support from the country's youth at election time - this mood does them no damage.

But for the reformists, outraged by the disqualification of hundreds of their candidates for parliamentary elections in February, political indifference is poison.


Young people are no longer prepared to risk violent protest
President Khatami's victory six years ago was achieved mainly because his ideas mobilised younger voters.

Now, however, not even the imprisonment of reformist politicians or banning of liberal newspapers mobilises them. They see the reformists as part of the Islamic establishment and have little sympathy for them.

Many people say they are not planning to vote in the elections, because it will not make any difference to the ruling clerics anyway. So turn-out is expected to be low, which will only help the conservatives.

Secularism

Unlike their counterparts in the rest of the Middle East, many young Iranians are openly pro-American, and approve of the American lifestyle.

Secularism is now becoming one of the main demands in Iran. The country where the idea of political Islam was born has become the place where it is slowly dying.

It is not just ordinary Iranians who are saying that the mullahs should return to the mosques. Some mullahs, too, have concluded that it would be better for their faith if religion kept out of politics.

These issues, remarkably, are debated openly in Iran, even within the clerical establishment.

This new openness has been the hallmark of the years since President Khatami came to power.

Many newspapers have started up and then been closed by the conservative authorities. But the momentum for debate has not been stopped.

The biggest growth area has been the internet and interest in the international media.

Although in theory watching satellite television is forbidden, it is very largely tolerated.

Sacred leader

The Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is now the principal target of popular resentment.

He is seen as the main obstacle to democracy and freedom in Iran.

During recent demonstrations, some people dared for the first time to denounce him personally.

However, a well-organised minority still support the ayatollah and see him as a sacred leader whose orders should be obeyed without question.

A small group of extremists among them attack critics of the regime and disrupt meetings in the name of defending the supreme leader and Islamic values.

Another big change in Iran is the increasingly assertive and visible role of women in society.

For the first time in Iranian history, over 60% of new entrants to universities are women. Women are now at the forefront of calls for reform and for greater social freedom.

But despite the general lightening up of the atmosphere, the law remains the same.

Restaurants can still be closed for allowing un-Islamic behaviour, people caught drinking can still face a flogging, and hardliners still intimidate women who are deemed to be improperly dressed.

Chinese model?

While many Iranian people, especially women, say they have forced the ruling clerics to accept that change is a reality, others think that the regime's tolerance of more individual freedoms is part of a long-term plan.

Nobel winner Shirin Ebadi - one of many women calling for reform
Conservative leaders, they believe, would like to follow a so-called Chinese model of society, where there is relative individual freedom but tight political control.

The still-powerful former president, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, has said that he favours such a model.

But there is a limit to what the ruling clerics will tolerate.

Devout Muslims see hejab as the symbol of Islam and would never accept a freer dress code for women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. it has been widely known in foreign policy circles for years
that if you want to change the middle east Iran was the most likely source of that change. Since most of the middle age men were killed in the Iran/Iraq wars the youth numbers are in a majority. Why we thought the cesspool Iraq with their divisions (kurds vs Sunni vs Sh'ite) could be the 'saving grace' of the arab world is beyond me. Student activists have usually led the way in any major shift in policy in every country in the world. YOUTH POWER TO THE PEOPLE (and I'll be 50 this year hehe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC