Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lead poisoning, are you concerned?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
LibLabUK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:56 AM
Original message
Lead poisoning, are you concerned?
I was doing a "shits and giggles" PubMed (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi)search.

I was quite suprised at how much literature was available on the risk of lead poisoning to occupational and recreational shooters.

One article in the American Journal of Public Health (Am J Public Health. 1987 Sep;77(9):1225-6.) contains a case report on a range employee suffering from a neurological toxicity due to lead poisoning and other employees at the same range suffering from less severe symptoms.

Another study (Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993 Feb;66(2):163-8.) found that only mildly increased levels of lead in the blood (>25microgrammes/dl) had a detrimental effect on the individual's immune system.

A study from New Zealand (N Z Med J. 1993 Oct 13;106(965):422-4) concluded that the risk of lead poisoning from small-bore rifle shooting was significant for only 70mins/week time spent on the range. Infact red cell lead levels were 2.4 times normal in male shooters.

Do ranges do anything to lower the level of airbourne lead?

Do ranges warn women of childbearing age and parents of the increased levels of airbourne lead?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. The current indoor range I use
has a sign on the door leading to the range saying pregnant women should not enter due to lead. If an indoor range has good ventilation it reduces lead exposure. Several of the ammo companys make ammo now with complete jacket bullets and lead free primers for indoor shooting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. not to mention wildlife

http://www.bconnex.net/~smorel/trumpet/wye1.html

Obstacles to Overcome

When Wye Marsh <in Ontario> began re-introducing Trumpeter Swans <which had been wiped out by hunting earlier in the 20th century>, there was no indication that lead poisoning would be an issue. Waterfowl occasionally ingest spent lead shot (mistaking it for grit), resulting in poisoning, and frequently death. It appears Trumpeters are no exception to lead poisoning - in fact, they are perhaps more prone to it than other waterfowl, because their long necks enable them to reach deep into the sediment where lead shot may be found. After the illness and death of several swans, a ban restricting the use of lead shot in hunting was established, but research concluded that lead shot would continue to be available for decades, due to its slow sinking rate into the sediment. The Wye Marsh, in conjunction with the Severn Sound Remedial Action Plan (RAP), spent years researching and developing a device to help accelerate the sedimentation rate of lead pellets, putting them out of the reach of swans and other waterfowl. The RAP has been remediating lead “hot spots” within Wye Marsh with the device, and plans to treat several similarly affected surrounding wetlands, helping to prevent future cases of lead poisoning in Trumpeters and other waterfowl.


Ah, those environmentally sensitive hunters, eh?


http://www.ec.gc.ca/minister/speeches/l_b_sp_e.htm

Speech delivered by the Honourable Sheila Copps, P.C., M.P.
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Environment
Toronto July 24, 1995

I have strong messages to send today about three key issues: lead shot; benzene; and the attack on important environmental legislation in the United States Congress.

Across Canada, up to 6 million birds eat spent lead shot gun pellets each year. Ducks, geese and swans mistake lead pellets for food. Poisoning occurs after swallowing just a few pellets. The scientists in my department have concluded that at least a quarter of a million waterfowl are killed annually from eating lead.

In turn, bald eagles and other predators die from eating crippled or dead waterfowl. Our studies show that more than 10% of dead eagles have been lead poisoned.

Under the authority of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, I am announcing a national ban on lead shot for migratory game bird hunting to come into effect in 1997. ... We have moved to unleaded fuel. Surely, we must move to unleaded birds.


Of course, bald eagles aren't the only ones who eat those leaded birds. I would hope that the effects of lead poisoning on children are known to all. That would be why we no longer make pencils with lead, right?


From the Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, US Geological Survey:
http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/pbpoison/intro.htm

I gather that there is a ban in the US:
http://migratorybirds.fws.gov/issues/nontoxic_shot/nontoxic.htm
which refers to the NPWRS:
http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/pbpoison/pbpoison.htm#contents

Given that the problem has been common knowledge for over a century (see that NPWRC site), it does seem like too little too late.

And apart from the toxicity danger to humans, the waterfowl themselves do die rather horrible deaths in lead poisoning cases.


But firing ranges, you ask? Dear me, surely you're not suggesting that there is something inherently dangerous to human beings about some product manufactured by the firearms industry!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibLabUK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. To be honest, it didn't occur to me...
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 08:39 AM by LibLabUK
But now you've mentioned it, I do remember that the use of lead fishing-line sinkers (is that the correct term? I'm not an angler) has been banned here in the UK for a while now because of the poisoning of waterfowl.

Dear me, surely you're not suggesting that there is something inherently dangerous to human beings about some product manufactured by the firearms industry!

It would appear so. Should lead-containing products come with a warning?

The effects of low levels of lead are:

- Decreased intelligence
- Slowed growth
- Impaired hearing
- ADD/ADHD
- Hyperactivity
- Violent tendancies
- Alzheimer's Syndrome

And in pregnant women:
- Spontaneous abortion
- Stillbirth
- Premature delivery
- Low birth weight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You were joking, right?
"Of course, bald eagles aren't the only ones who eat those leaded birds. I would hope that the effects of lead poisoning on children are known to all. That would be why we no longer make pencils with lead, right?"

Pencil lead was always a misnomer. It's always been graphite that is in a pencil.

http://www.pencils.com/unlead.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. sorry to confuse you!
It was the paint on pencils that was leaded. Children chew pencils, ingest paint, ingest lead. Leaded paint is no longer used on pencils.

And lead pigment has also been used in the "lead" in coloured pencils. I assume that it no longer is in North America, although it apparently is in, e.g., Mexico.

.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. A Question
Is there another material that could be used in ammunition to replace lead? Just curious.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibLabUK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hmm
Depleted uranium? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. heh
http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/duupdate.htm

A press report from January 10, 2001 reported that ‘Defense Secretary William Cohen had said earlier this month that DU was no more dangerous than "leaded paint," and a U.S. Army briefer assured reporters it was safe enough to eat’. I do not know of any scientist or physician that would insinuate that either lead paint or uranium is safe to eat. Although numerous requests from the Iraqi government or their representatives attending medical conferences on Gulf War Illnesses for medical care and environmental clean up have been made united States Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs have rebuffed these requests.


Happened to have noticed that site while googling for leaded pencil-paint!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Reminds Me of the PCB Controversy
PCB is an oily liquid used to fill power transformers, and it's an environmental headache. A politician (I think it was former NY Governor Mario Cuomo) once offerred to drink a whole glass of PCBs. I'm pretty sure no one took him up on his offer.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That was the late comic Hugh Carey
weighing in on GE's side when the corporation was angrily insisting PCB was not a carcinogen (it is).

Carey also became a figure of fun in New York due to his marriage to the "widow of a Greek tycoon" who turned out, after a little digging by the press, to be the thrice-divorced wife of an auto mechanic, plumber, and pizza parlor owner (three different guys) all of whom were alive and well. He amused New York voters by dyeing his hair Bozo-red during the romance; Jimmy Breslin discovered that his code name among his State Ppolice protective detail had been switched to "Howdy Doody."

To be fair, Carey did move quickly in the Love Canal crisis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Sorry - I Had The Wrong Governor
My memory's getting a bit fuzzy at times.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. S'okay
At the time Breslin and Hamill were both at the Daily News and they had lots of fun....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. I sure in the hell wouldnt drink it
A transformer blew up a couple of miles from my house about a month ago and the liquid spread over someone's yard. The city dug up the entire yard and carted off the dirt. Guess it aint that safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Experiments ongoing
two biggest problems is stability in bullets, and reliability in primers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibLabUK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Question...
"stability in bullets"

Inflight, or in storage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Inflight
If you store bullets in a cool dry place should'nt matter what they are made with. There is another issue with this debate and that is of liability. I believe everybody, civilians and police officers alike that carry a gun for defense should practice with the ammo that they carry in their defensive pistols. And lead free primers are not reliable enough to trust your life to, they a great for the range but not the mean streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. from that NPWRC site
http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/pbpoison/toxicosi.htm

Losses due to crippling
As early as 1978 Roster (1978b:26) argued the case for steel shot: "Although steel shot can bag ducks as well as lead shot can, the belief persists that steel shot will cripple more waterfowl and damage shotguns. This belief stems from ignorance of the results of tests to investigate gunbarrel damage as well as from ignorance of the ballistic properties of steel shot. Ballistically, steel shot can be loaded to perform as well as lead shot in bagging waterfowl out to seventy yards. Steel shot retains its shape better than lead shot does, and compensations can be made for its lighter weight, enabling it to retain energy as well as lead shot." Nevertheless, waterfowl hunters continue to voice objections to steel shot. A primary objection is based on the belief that a greater number of ducks are crippled (mortally wounded and unretrieved) by steel shot than are poisoned and crippled by lead shot (National Wildlife Federation 1985b). In an Ohio survey, 45 percent of the hunters cited this reason for their opposition to steel shot (Smith and Townsend 1981). In Colorado, hunters of Canada geese feared that crippling losses would increase if steel shot were used (Szymczak 1978). Waterfowl hunters in California also identified crippling as their principal objection to steel shot (Leach 1980).


There's more.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. As a life-long duck hunter
I can tell you that the reason so many ducks are wounded is not because of the type of shot used, but the skill of the shooter.

There is a highly objectionable practice of novice hunters we call sky-busting. They attempt to call ducks in to the decoys and when the ducks make their first pass (around 50 mph), the novice hunters open fire, usually at excessive ranges.

Now, I make it a rule not to shoot ducks that are farther than 30 yards away and only shoot those that are settling into the decoys (less than 30 mph), that ensures that the duck is close and slow enough for a clean kill.

I've used steel shot for my entire hunting life, and I can count the number of lost and crippled ducks on one hand. If only hunters get out to the skeet range about once a month, all year, that will be about sufficient to help them retain their hunting skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Steel shot and copper jackets
Most shotgun shells, at least in the midwest, are all steel shot these days. The trap club I shoot at only allows steel shot. Lead shot has been gone for years. I'm sure there are some old boxes sitting aorund on somebody's closet shelf but they can't sell it commercially.

OSHA and EPA inspectors can do "drop ins" at any private club or public range.

Rifle and pistol ammunition is usually copper jacketed to cover the lead in the bullet portion of the cartridge. The only exception is some small caliber .22 rounds and those are usually "varnished" to seal the lead bullet.

Standard range safety procedure also includes washing your hands after every session with cold water to minimize any lead transfer. All the ranges I have been to have it posted prominently, along with the warnings for pregnant women etc.

In Illinois at least there is also a stringent air circulation requirement that has the air in any indoor range passing through several specialty filters and being required to be totally changed every so many minutes. They also have vents that push the air away from the firing line toward the filters at the far end of the range.

Both the lead and the brass at every range I've ever been to are recycled. It's too expensive to get rid of any other way.

Don P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. yeah
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 09:45 AM by Romulus
there are "green" ammo alternatives being produced right now. I think they use tungsten or something. They are almost twice as much in price as the non-"green" ammo - hopefully the price will drop in the future. Some ranges have completely banned the use of non-"green" ammo. Others don't care what you bring. And there are still more, like the range I am joining in my new state of residence x( , that require you to only shoot with ammo that you buy from them and that you have to completely use up while you are there (apparently a county ordinance/agreement before they would let the range operate) - and they don't offer "green" ammo.

I became aware of this lead issue last year. I wear a respirator rated for lead when I go to the range. The range employees wear one just like it. I get some double-takes, but people used to look at hearing-protection wearers the same way. Now those same "lookers" ask you to repeat everything you say to them.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. There already is
for example, due to Federal legislation back in the 60's or 70's, all waterfowl hunters had to switch to non-lead shot so that ducks and geese, when ingesting pellets, are not poisoned and die slowly.

As a result, all waterfowl hunters in the US use non-toxic, non-lead shot, such as steel, tungsten, and bismuth.

The Army is adopting "green" bullets, ones that decompose over time without toxicity, but still deliver the necessary downrange performance.

Brian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. See? You Learn Something New Every Day
Thanks to everyone who responded to my question.

Wayne
(CO Liberal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Is the military using it for practice and combat
ops? I retired before it became an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Both
Lookie here: Link

The only problem I see is that tungsten is a helluva lot more expensive than lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Expense would be an issue
And I would guess if we ever get engaged in another major war lead would make a comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. of course
I did already say all that about waterfowl and lead shot.

One would think that anyone concerned about verbiage (naming no names) might bother to read what has already been said before saying it all over again ...

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. I'd like to see...
...some one that is on your side of the gun issue say that they read
all of your long posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I do
it's such a relief after all the idiotic RKBA rubbish to read the posts of someone honest who actually can make a logical argument..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. What a pantload...
...peddle it to someone dumb enough to believe it! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Gee, roe...
I'M not the one whining that long posts are too hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Another pantload...
...right on top of the first one. It's starting to smell in here Ben.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. You'll notice...
that the code has an exemption for using those substances in shotshells. It would be illegal to use them in handgun ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. There are a LOT of things that COULD be used...
Unfortunately, Federal law prohibits it. They call it "armor piercing".


Case in point: East German 7.62x39 MM ammo. It had a steel core, and a steel case, because it was much cheaper to produce than lead-core jacketed bullets, and steel casings are much cheaper than brass. It was banned from import as "AP" ammo.

The law is that the core of the bullet must be lead.

Talk about unintended consequences...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemInIdaho Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Bismuth has more weight than lead and is more inert
Cost is a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Bismuth is prohibited....
for rounds that could be used in a handgun. So is steel, tungsten, iron, brass, bronze, berrylium copper, and Depleted Uranium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemInIdaho Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I rarely use a handgun when hunting ducks
Everytime I take one down on the wing from a hip draw my buddies think I'm showing off. I'm too shy to put up with the ribbing so I mostly use a scatter gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I have to confine my wing shooting to clays...
because State law prohibits hunting with submachineguns. I do pretty well with the clays, though. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
44. quite a few actually...
lead is cheap and effective though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. not only that, but lead particles get in your clothes and stay there
i was reading about the Robert Blake murder case, (typical story) and was struck by the persistence of the lead residue. (see first and last paragraphs quoted below) creepy.

``...
VAN NUYS, Calif. — Forensic evidence linking Robert Blake to the gun that killed his wife crumbled Tuesday when a criminalist testifying in Blake's preliminary hearing for murder admitted that a "hobby or occupation" involving guns was enough to produce a positive test for gunshot residue.

"It could be from that association and not necessarily the recent discharge of a firearm," testified Steven Dowell, a scientist with the Los Angeles County coroner's office. ...

Another LAPD criminalist said he conducted the test on Blake's hands despite a published instruction not to test for gunshot residue on individuals who have handled guns because he wanted to "err on the side of caution." ...

Dowell also cast doubt on positive gunshot residue tests performed on Blake's clothing, noting that, in some cases, gunshot residue can remain in clothing for a year or longer. ...
...''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
36. New ranges...
must be built to OSHA specs for air removal. I think the standard is the entire volume of air must be purified every 15 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC