Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if you outlaw high powered automatic weapons,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:18 PM
Original message
if you outlaw high powered automatic weapons,
only Blackwater will have high powered automatic weapons.

If there is to be war...at least give your side a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a foolish argunemt. The idea that as long as you're armed, you can
fight off an imperial gov't is really stupid. You coul;d have 5 AR15's and if tanks roll down your street, you're done! My FIL used to talk like that. "I've got my guns so I can fight them off from trying to take them from me!" Yea right! Some people will simply never look at reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Be clear on one thing, it's not to win, but not to be herded, that's all.
I predict that if McCain wins this country will devolve into anarchy. Suit yourself, but I know that the unarmed person is the one listed as 'dead'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. To continue, it's for an insurgent style conflict. (maybe you don't know what that is?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh I know what that is, but to think any civilians aould possibly win is
insane! The idea was a fair one 100 years ago, but today...comeon. I've got a gun safe full of guns and amunition, but I'm smart enough to realize that even if everyone in my neighborhood had the same thing, we don't stand a chance against what our military has. It's a foolish argument. I have my guns because I like to target shoot and hunt. We've had many years when the deer we shot during hunting season provided food for us for mosre than half the year. To think you're keeping your guns for defence against the US gov't is stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. I never thought the citizens of the US would be rated 2nd behind those of N Vietnam and the Al-Quida
but that's what you are inferring. So, I'll reiterate ... do you know what an insurgency is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. First Amendment lets us have this....
http://www.amazon.com/Guerrilla-Warfare-Ernesto-Che-Guevara/dp/9562915719/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1225043233&sr=8-4

Among others...

I don't care for the ideological twist of it but he's sure a practical thinker about some stuff.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Whic is why we just invested in "arms" and I just now at 62 learned to shoot one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The Second Amendment does not come with warranties...
That said, I can only point to a place called "Iraq" for an example of how a lightly-equipped force has stymied the aims of a government (ours) from effecting imperial policy through a modern military equipped with tanks, planes, helicopters, heavy artillery, missiles, ships,.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm all in favor of "Sporting Rifles"
But mock up assault weapons - I have no use for them

and I am an avid hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I hope your lack of use for "mock up assault weapons" doesn't mean a ban:
Bans of this sort are what keep the gun-control issue simmering on the back burner, for the GOP to use in the future (like they have used it in the past). Frankly, after shooting a "mock up" AK-47, I must say the carbine fit like a glove, kicked very little, and would be VERY comfortable carrying while hunting. You will note that Cabela's is now offering the Remington R-25 in .243 WIN or .308 WIN, and other manufacturers are acting similarly with their own "mock ups." If I were 30 years-old and not 60, I would probably purchase one of these arms because they are accurate, much easier to carry and operate, and much more comfortable to shoot than the very nice Remington 700 Classic in .270 which I now use.

Try a "mock up." These weapons ARE the face of the new big-game rifle in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. .223 and .308. One for loong range and one for close. The .223 ammo is very light
There are many reasons the US uses a .223 round and sells others the AK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Fine, don't own them. But a lot more Americans own "assault weapons" than hunt.
"Assault weapons" are the most popular sporting rifles in the United States, if you remember that competitive and recreational target shooting are "sports" just as much as hunting is. Only 1 in 5 U.S. gun owners hunts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Is there a difference?
Do you object to an AR because it looks a bit odd when compared to a nice wood and blue steel rifle? And just because you don't like them, do you think nobody else should own one?

It's an unpleasant topic because at it's heart, the AR is a fighting gun. I know folks who get uneasy when they are faced with the reality that fighting guns exist. You just can't get around that with the AR because it was always meant to be that even before Stoner put his pencil to paper. Just like the Garand, the '03 Springfield, the 1911, and countless others, they are purpose-built tools. And, unfortunately, so is the 2nd Amendment at it's heart a bit of language that reserves for the citizen the right to own such arms. It refers to militia, not hunting parties, and we all know what militias are organized to do. We should never forget how this great country came into existence. It's ours as citizens, not subjects, and we should protect all our rights, even those rights you don't personally think you need.

It's not about choice of firearm. It's about Constitutional Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. No love for firearms designed with self-defense in mind?


:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. We have to outlaw corporate militias. Aren't they already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Muzzle nuzzler alert.
Stand against more guns as a matter of principle.

It's a downward death spiral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Reality Check
The number of guns in this country, both hunting and sporting ('assault weapons') has bee rising for the last 20 years, yet the overall crime rate and the violent crime rate is at 40 year lows...except, of coarse, in the areas which have the most restrictive gun laws...hmmmm

"It's a downward death spiral." :spray:

Gun Control is a downward tyranny spiral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Your home, your choice. My home, my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Don't "nuzzle your muzzle." That is a death wish. Unload first (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Every rifle I own was the "state-of-the-art, high-powered rapid-fire assault rifle" of its day.
I'm prepping my 1895 Winchester and my 1899 Remington-Lee
for deer season- both were considered "Modern High Tech Military Weapons"
when they were new. Both fire the 30-40 Krag round; that was considered an
amazing, laser-accurate round back when most guns still used black powder.

My 1873 Remington Rolling Block was Remington's most successful
military rifle EVER...
And my 45-caliber flintlock RIFLE once struck fear into the hearts
of British troops armed with current-standard 69-caliber smoothbore muskets.

Folks who think my UZI and my AK-47 look out of place
with the rest of my collection are folks who just don't
know what they're looking at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. How many automatic weapons do you have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's not the point.
I keep an AR around. It's a handy little carbine but there are others that would be just as good for no more than I do with it.

The point is we are endowed with the Right to Keep and Bear Arms both in the defense of our Nation and our selves. As of today, the AR15 is still the best tool for the job.

Maybe you win, maybe you lose. My time in this Earthly tent is limited anyway so I don't worry too much about that aspect. The point is the people should never give up the option to resist tyranny with whatever means they have at their disposal. By the same token, in the highly unlikely event of a call to arms, you have to have the tools to respond.

Beyond that, look up the Battle of Blair Mountain some time and then tell me that kind of thing can't happen in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Umm, they're ALREADY very tightly controlled.
If you're thinking of "assault weapons," those are low-to-medium-powered, NON-automatic civilian firearms, not high-powered automatic weapons.

Possession of any automatic weapon outside of police/military duty without Federal authorization (BATFE Form 4) is a 10-year Federal felony under the Title 2/Class III provisions of the National Firearms Act of 1934.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. After 8 years of preaching that sermon on DU I am amazed at how many DUers are still grossly
ignorant about one of the divisive, polarizing political issues that continues to decide close elections in some house, senate, and presidential elections.

I must conclude those people are equally ignorant about other important issues and are poorly prepared to get in the face of voters and convince them to support a Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Automatic weapons are worthless except to the ammo manufacturers. Semi auto is very effective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. Please define "high powered automatic weapons".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC