Santa brought me an AR-15

I now have an LWRC M6 flat top. As soon as I can afford some optics, I will get a holo dot sight. The fun of a 15 flat is seeing how many toys you can hang on it.

This is the proverbial "assualt-weapon". It is perfectly legal. It is no more dangerous than my 12 ga. Mossberg or my Sig 226 .40.

I also have a cross-bow and fishing rods.

See, I enjoy guns and outdoors and bows and life. Others may dissagree and like other things. But there are many who want to label me as a criminal or killer.

I always thought those were cool

santa's a beeatch.He only brought me a .300 ultramag :)

The wife was against THAT much firepower until she saw what a bear did to the neighbors dog.

A more accurate label would probably be a fetishist.

"Golly gee willikers, that person wants to put a holographic sight and a flashlight on their rifle. They must want to have sex with it!" :silly:

I've noticed that pretty much the only people who view guns sexually are the ones who loathe them...

That's always nice.

For those that don't know LWRC rifles perfected the AR piston upper.

I wanted a Glock 10mm but guess Santa couldnt find a deal on one before Christmas.
Been looking best I can find is for about $600. Guns are great investments because unlike oil and Viagra they will never crash!

A 12 ga slug will do a lot more penetration damage than a sporting grade 5.56 round.

Which is of course not to say that 5.56 isn't a significant risk for overpenetration. It is, and anyone who says otherwise is buying into a myth. But it's slightly less dangerous than 12 ga.

always check state laws when you travel with any gun. I think NY and MD have AW bans too.

confiscate it.

I had a WWII British Sten, 9mm, fully auto, machine gun with a 30 round mag that the cops found. They took it away and wouldn't give it back and basically told me I was a bad boy and don't do it again.

Long story. Don't ask.

CA is very gun unfriendly to begin with.

Are you one o' them law-abidin' gun owners I hear so much about?

Here is the story, and yes, I know it claims he "modified" the weapon, but they are still not allowed even pre-ban with no flash-hider or bayonet lug in CA.

Just a warning to others about the laws in CA:

http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/crime/archives/cat_gun_ordinances.html

You can own ARs as long as they were registered or are made with a off list lower and have a fixed 10 rd mag.

His upper is totally legal in CA if it meets the above requirements.

Then again who said he is from CA??

Do you do a fixed mag AR? I can't even picture it.

You can have a truly fixed magazine- you have to remove the rear takedown pin and flip up to reload, or you can have a magazine that isn't removable without a tool- just so happens that the 'tool' can be a bullet. Called the 'bullet button'.

eta: http://www.riflegear.com/p-193-bullet-button-bullet-tool-combo.aspx

I've never heard of such a thing. Popping the take-down pins to reload would suck, but I guess that would work. I guess I was expecting some sort of machined side port for loading it like a shotgun or something.

I have a couple of 30 banana mags. Cripe, you can buy 50's and a whack-o 100 weird thing that feeds rounds from two spiral carthages.

Never heard of a fixed mag. I am on the east coast.

The fixed mag thing is a California requirement.

The regulation specifically states a bullet could be considered such a tool (this was in response to the concern, in the wake of legislation outlawing detachable magazine SKSes as "assault weapons," that all SKSes would be so banned since the normal fixed magazine SKSes can be field-stripped, and the magazine removed, using a bullet point).

Dumb legislation drafted by people who know little about guns + legal clarification from state law enforcement agency = hijinks for gun nuts.

Now you can build up any "banned" rifle you want in California, as long as it's not listed by name, simply by installing a shroud of some kind around the magazine release, so the magazine cannot be detached with a finger unaided. Another poster linked to the AR bullet button, and the same principle can be applied to AK-47s, Saiga-12s, Drugonovs, etc.

ARs with bullet buttons are now being used in Three Gun competitions in California in which the participants are wearing rings with studs on them they can use to drop the "fixed" magazines.

Isn't gun control fun? As long as stupid people write the legislation, we'll continue to find ways to get around it.

I have a carry permit and do all the right things. I sense some tongue-in-cheek so maybe I don't know the nature of your question.

The LWRC the OP bought is not on the list, and many Californians have in recent years built rifles on LWRC lowers.

The California Assault Weapon Ban is pretty toothless these days, thanks to a combination of poorly-drafted legislation; a couple of legal smackdowns in California courts; a lazy and ideological Department of Justice (recently overhauled and vastly improved under new Attorney General Jerry Brown*); and aggressive activism on the part of California gun enthusiasts. In the last three years or so, tens of thousands of otherwise banned "assault weapons" have been flooding into the state to be built up into perfectly legal configurations, like this one:



Here's a link to an LWRC rifle that was sold in California last month.

The California Assault Weapon Ban (actually two separate laws) is an excellent example of why people who don't know anything about guns should avoid writing legislation attempting to restrict them.


* Jerry Brown's approach to gun control legislation has been so refreshingly reasonable and common-sense that I know a number of Republican California gun nuts who will be giving him their vote if he decides to run for Governor again (especially since the Republicans are likely to nominate another gun-grabber). Perhaps being mayor of Oakland gave him a good perspective on what kind of law enforcement works and what doesn't.

A few years back I started up a conversation with an older man, I'm 60. He had a cast on his left hand and I ask him about it. He said he had shot himself while cleaning his gun. Not looking me in the eye, he went on to tell me he has been an NRA safety instructor for over 30 years. I always think of him when handling any firearm.

I met a guy with a limp. He story was that while he was attended Navy Nuclear Power School in Idaho, he purchased a western style .44.

He drove his truck out to the open plains and decided to play Barney Fife. As it goes, he nearly shot his knee-cap off. To make it interesting, it was his left leg and he was all alone with a manual shift truck and had to drive 20 miles to get back to civilization. He told me it is possible to drive a manual with one leg...

Without a doubt, guns can hurt people. I also ride a Harley and have jumped out of an airplane over a thousand times. Life is a risk and ain't none of us are gettin' out of it alive!

But don't hang too much stuff on it. Not only will it get heavy, all that stuff can get confusing!! Been thinking of building a AR with that system, if finances allow it then this may be the year.
What twist? 62gr ammo is getting a little steep $$.

Oneshooter
Livin in Texas

of 55 grs. Federal. The twist is 1/9.

I put a Bushbnell on the top and sighted it in at 100 ft. (Indoord range). I am not a marksman but once I got it dialed in, it was silly. All I could do is drill a quarter size hole in the middle of the target. That is the gun control I love.

I'm still not sold on the whole piston thing yet, especially with bolt cant issues still cropping up.

Before thanksgiving, I picked out my christmas present, and built it- an AR-15 pistol.

If not, be prepared for sticker shock.

I went to the range over Christmas. I bought 2 50-round boxes of .44 mag, 3 100-round boxes of 9mm, and 2 50-round boxes of .45. I think it cost about $180. It's insane. I have a Lee reloader I've never taken out of the box. I need to check and see if it is cheaper to reload these days. I've all but quit shooting my .45 because the 9mm is half-price. A 250-round box of .45 is $81 at Walmart.

It's getting ridiculous when 3 trips to the shooting range costs as much for ammo as buying a gun. It won't be long and all I'll be able to afford to shoot is .22LR.

it is a lot less expensive. My family (4 competition shooters in 3 sports)will go through 400-500rounds a month. And that is just at the matches!!! Add practice and it adds up to 1000-1200 rounds per month!!
Just remember to get a good manual and follow the recipes inside. Since you have a basic setup the supplies to load 200rds of center fire pistol with jacketed ammo is about $65. $45-50 if you use cast and lubed lead bullets.
It is also a fun part of the hobby, very relaxing.

Oneshooter
Livin in Texas

Since all of my shooting is punching holes in paper, lead bullets are fine with me. I'm guessing this leads to increased lead fouling of the barrel? Do you have to clean in any special way after shooting cast lead?

a hard cast bullet and keep your velocities below 1200fps, or if you want more speed use a bullet with a gas check. No special cleaning needs to be done. All of your supplies can be bought on the net.

Oneshooter
Livin in Texas

but at the shows and online, I can find it at .43/round. Right now, I have only fired about 300 rounds but if I decide to get real deep into 223/556, I might look into reloading.

too expensive to shoot plus our one range doesn't allow Wolf ammo

About one box of wal-mart federal bulk pack 22lr makes up for the difference in cost :)

But there are many who want to label me as a criminal or killer.

so we can all spank them.

Any names you can name?

but I haven't managed to figure out what your Christmas present has to do with firearms policy.

I got a bunch of milk chocolate and a spiffy new shiny white hand mixer. The co-vivant got a bunch of dark chocolate and a spiffy new brushed aluminum coffee cannister. See, we're a practical, sweet-toothed pair who mostly hang around the house and don't actually need any more junk.

Fascinating, eh?

If either one of us so much as thought about bringing any kind of firearm into the house, the other would leave. Well, he'd leave in either case. It's my house. But I can rest assured that no matter what other crap the future might bring, that isn't going to be part of it.

Isn't it nice that we're all happy with our stuff?

sad that an issue such as a non-firearms-policy thread here in the Gungeon would keep you at the keyboard well past the witching hour. But then again, though I disagree with your beliefs, I can appreciate the fact that you take your morals against the ownership of 50BMG etc so seriously.

I mean, someone has to man the watchtowers along the St. Lawrence.........


:rofl:

I couldn't resist.



I will take a pic of mine to post soon.

will bring me one next year.

and women and children would have died, would seem to be the logical extension of your thought.

Too bad your government didn't and doesn't stay the fuck out of other people's countries.

thanks

not?

I'll be happy to read anything you have to say. Step right up to that plate.

After reading it, I realized you were talking about Vietnam and not the current war.



Carry on...

Read it as applying to the current war. Or any number of the US's many other military adventures you might think of ...


typo fixed

I already replied to this

Perhaps one day your own country will heed it.

had not flown planes into our Trade Center and Pentagon.

I suppose we were supposed to turn the other cheek after 2-3 thousand Americans were murdered by terrorist??

That may be the Canadian thing to do, but we do things different down here.

I apologize to the Op for going off the subject.

Oh yea i'm still jealous of you new AR.

Carry on..

Incisive sociopolitical analysis, that's it. The sort not often found elsewhere at this website, I might note. The sort sometimes found in, oh, the National Review ...

:eyes:

Your not going to let me live that one down are you??

I guess I deserve it, you just keep things challenging around here.

Your arguments help me when I argue with real anti gun people.

Carry on...

as I was watching the telly last night.


We wouldn't be in this war if the terrorist had not flown planes into our Trade Center and Pentagon.
I suppose we were supposed to turn the other cheek after 2-3 thousand Americans were murdered by terrorist??

I think what you're saying is that the US invaded and occupied Iraq because of the attack on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

Have you discovered the missing link that has eluded the rest of the world??

Can you disclose it now, or are you bound by some sort of oath of secrecy?

>>I apologize to the Op for going off the subject.

I was pretty young when 9/11 happened. It is the seminal event that triggered my interest in self-defence. I decided that I could not wait for America to defend me under any and all situations.

Since then I have taken all kinds of defensive training. I am a black belt and have over 1300 skydives. Anyone who has jumped in Deland would know me. I also stock dry goods.

I don't know what is going to happen in the future but me and my girldfriend will be there.

saved lots of lives.

I can believe someone would give a soldier a rifle with no cleaning kit and not chrome line the barrel in a jungle environment..

The should have jailed the guy that allowed it to happen.

chrome lined is the standard. I only run swabs; no brush at least so far. It is a mirrow in there. Then I do a rub down with a silicon rag. My girl claims it is a sexual thing and I don't argue back. may that fetish guy was on to something. I don't care. I'll take love where I find it. :)

You have one of the nicest ARs being made.

Enjoy

I was able to find AR's in right at the $1000 range but the LWRC is a tad more!

I don't care for piston guns myself but if you like it that's all that matters. One of these days won't it be nice to just argue DI versus Piston and then start making good-natured fun of AK's?

Out of the eight or ten guys I talked to at work last night, all but one of them got an AR for Christmas. One guy has eight now. Another one got a couple of cases of ammo from Santa.

My boys were given a couple of toy AR's by a relative. I don't care for toy guns but I caved this time. In a couple of years when it comes time for them to learn to shoot, the toy guns will hit the trash never to be seen again.

she passed in '03 but she was a gutsy, men should be men kind of lady. I love her so much for it.
The safest thing you can do with your boys is teach them to be responsible men. Rather than hide the guns, find someone to teach them the proper and safe use for them.

I grew up around guns all my life. I have never pointed one at something I did not intend to suit. My Mom always said she felt safer in our home than anywhere else on the planet.

I am the youngest of four boys, all harley riders and gun owners, and if we could have hunted down and killed pancreatic cancer, my mom would still be alive today.

Let your boys be warriors. It transforms into every other aspect of a mans life. Trust me.

The reason? I am partial to the M1a. My last purchase was a scout version of the m1a-



I decided on one type of rifle a couple of years ago, it is easier to stock parts, magazines & ammunition. I live in a rural area & may need to the additional range a .308 rifle has.

I am planning to mount a night vision scope on this rifle.

From what I've been able to find, that's about a $1700 rifle.

http://www.impactguns.com/store/springfield_m1a.html

The most I've ever paid for a firearm is about $600.

I got my AK-47 (SAR-1) for $350 just after the last assault weapons ban. Now they are going for $700. I'd buy another Beretta CX4 before a $700 AK-47.

And iverglas will probably remind us all of other CX4 owners who murdered people with them, because that is what she does.

I live in an area where the additional range of the .308 round would be useful. I also have "quite a bit" of .308 ammo & "quite a few" magazines for this type of rifle. If I had bought an AK or AR type I would end up having to spend that (1700) for the rifle, ammo & magazines. Either way you pay.

. . . for one third to one half the price.

Look at the sight position. The rear sight of the saiga is forward of the ejection port. That does not lend itself to accuracy. A scoped rifle? It probably is accurate enough. Iron sights? No way.

Good taste does have a high price tag. At least it doesn't have the "shoulder thing that goes up" and a pistol grip. :evilgrin:

*sigh*

It may be used in a defensive situation though.

Those that are pushing for an "assault weapons ban" are either idiots or dishonest. There is no other explanation other than it is the easiest gun ban to pass. It bans guns just for the sake of banning guns. It DOES NOT ADDRESS the gun homicide problem at all. Around 3% of all gun homicides are committed by people using rifles of ANY type. Over 85% of all gun homicides are committed by people using handguns. Why aren't they trying to ban handguns??????????

DC had a 20 year handgun ban. Chicago still has handgun ban.

The AWB was simply a way to desensitize the public to gun bans.
See we are JUST banning assault weapons
See now we are JUST banning semi-auto pistols
See now we are JUST banning large caliber rifles
See now we are JUST banning junk guns
See now we are JUST banning imported guns
etc.

Eventually with each ban public acceptance grows.

Luckily Heller that seems to have stopped.

An AWB will likely be challenged w/ Heller as a precedent.
That isn't going to stop them from trying.
Heller used the language "weapons in common usage by law abiding citizens".
So called "assault weapons" are the single most common sold weapons after pistols.
All rifles are only used in <3% of crimes so "assault weapons" would be an even smaller %.

For the feds to prove in court (not using PR and doublespeak) that "assault weapons" are not "in common usage" and "used by law abiding citizens" will be difficult if not impossible.

"A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General."



My father drilled with these when he was in high school in the late forties. He used to take one home on Friday nights when his ROTC squad was going to march in away football games. It was the standard United States infantry rifle then.

A couple years later he carried one in Korea.

I traded up to mine - started with a new but faulty Marlin .41 lever action, swapped in towards a used M1S90 - traded that towards an AR-10, then turned that around for the M1A Scout. I think it was priced at $1400 a few years ago.

I did add another AR-10 and an AR-15, so I went with both in the long run!

any I cannot ever match the long range accurracy of that round. And there is something to be said for a sight that is not 3 inches above the barrell.

But I must admit that the AR is just such a toy....

Seriously. I shot expert in the Marine corps using iron sights of course. Twenty five years later I would not be able to achieve that without the aid of a good scope.

Don't get my statement wrong about never owning an AR or AK type rifle. There isn't anything wrong with them at all, the fact is that I only have a limited supply of cash. I had to ask myself which rifle would be the most useful for my area. If I had an unlimited supply of money I would own a few Ar's for sure.