Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“DHS, Drug Interdiction and Common Sense”, forget Posse Comitatus, integrate & expand existing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 10:55 AM
Original message
“DHS, Drug Interdiction and Common Sense”, forget Posse Comitatus, integrate & expand existing
federal forces and you have the makings of a Gestapo to be misused and abused by a decider in the Oval Office under existing laws.

Perhaps that’s what Napolitano meant, "We intend to go forward with the laws that we have. We're not going to wait for congress to act or not act". google.news

DHS, Drug Interdiction and Common Sense, Fighting drug cartels requires that all agencies get on the same page. Jim Giermanski says Memorada of Understanding are producing the opposite effect. (Jim Giermanski, Powers International)
The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (P.L.107-296) took many Federal agencies located in the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security (BTS) charged with, among many territorial areas of the country, securing our borders and managing ports of entry. Specifically, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Transportations and Security Administration (TSA) were moved from BTS to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). {1} ICE is the primary investigative branch of DHS. It has among its many duties "...interdicting narcotics shipments."{2} In Fiscal Year 2007, ICE drug-focused investigations led to "seizures of 241,967 pounds of cocaine, 4,331 pounds of heroin, 2,731 pounds of methamphetamine and 1.3 million pounds of marijuana. Additionally, ICE drug investigations led to 8,920 arrests and 5,539 convictions of individuals associated with narcotic violations." {3}

Now, the United States has an even greater urgency in disrupting the drug cartels of Mexico as they move into some U.S. cities. In February, 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced support for Mexican President Felipe Calderon's crackdown and fight against drug cartels. Her remarks followed President Obama's statement that "&Homeland Security is indistinguishable from National Security." Obama's officials further stated: DHS's job is "¬ just combating illegal immigration but on fighting criminal drug organizations..."{4} ICE has the responsibility in DHS for fighting these criminal cartels.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Why should there even be MOUs between DHS and the Department of Justice when their respective law enforcement agencies have drug interdiction responsibilities which by their nature include a required, and normal follow-up operations routinely made be all legitimate law enforcement agencies? These MOUs are nothing more than turf wars, with competing Federal agencies competing for attention, money, and credibility. Turf wars are certainly unnecessary especially in the face of not only horrific actions of Mexican drug cartels along our Southern border, but also in our cities. These drug-related crime waves in Mexico include killings, torture, kidnapping and corruption which threaten to spill over into the United States. Kidnappings already have! The United States needs no political issue, especially a turf issue, to divert attention from the serious escalation of drug and arms smuggling across its borders. "Our agents and officers, working together with local law enforcement agencies, are preventing millions of dollars from crossing the border into Mexico," said Secretary Napolitano. "In stopping the funds that fuel the drug war, we will stifle cartel activity in the United States while helping our neighbors to the south by cracking down on illegal cash before it gets there."{13} Imagine what would happen if ICE had Title-21 authority. Improvements in drug interdictions, investigations, and arrests, would result.

DEA, ICE, CBP, Border Patrol, and State and local enforcement entities must be on the same page of music. All of them should be given Title-21 authority. It's time for Congress to act to fix this quickly. It's no more than common sense. Certainly Congress could use more of that!

This looks like a trial balloon by Napolitano to expand DHS’ mission and use existing laws to ban semiautomatic firearms also incorrectly called assault weapons under the guise of the war on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. What reason is there for people to own semiautomatic firearms? Other than killing other people, what
use are they? Surely not for hunting, sorta overkill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They're just fine for hunting and target shooting, and have been used for it for many decades
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 12:54 PM by slackmaster
Why do you think a semiautomatic firearm is "overkill"? Are you unclear on what the term semiautomatic means?

:shrug:

Most rifles used in competitive target shooting, other than precision benchrest competition, are semiautomatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perhaps so. At any rate, seems like the animals don't have much of a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. California limits magazine capacity to five rounds on rifles, three on shotguns
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 01:14 PM by slackmaster
Other states have similar limits.

The ability to make follow-up shots more quickly than one can with a bolt, pump, or lever action weapon increases the probability that a wounded animal can be killed humanely.

Besides that, a semiautomatic firearm really doesn't give a hunter any kind of advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You may be confusing "automatic firearms" with "semiautomatic firearms". Suggest you read DU thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SsevenN Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. This is why ....
...I preffer the term 'self loading'

For some reason the word automatic gives people the heebie-jeebies :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Please explain how a semi-auto firearm is "overkill." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Just seems that if you have to use your bolt action or pump or whatever each time, the animals have
a sporting chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC