Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI report dispels "gun show loophole" myth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:18 PM
Original message
FBI report dispels "gun show loophole" myth
What we've known all a long there is NO 'Gunshow loophole'
http://www.alphecca.com/?p=1728

http://community.fox4kc.com/_SHOOT-OR-DONT-SHOOT/BLOG/670352/96364.html

http://community.fox4kc.com/_SHOOT-OR-DONT-SHOOT/BLOG/670352/96364.html

The offenders were of a different mind-set than the officers they confronted, and researchers got to see just how cold-blooded the younger generation of offenders is. Where 50 officers in the study had experienced situations where they had the legal authority to use deadly force, but chose not to shoot, the offenders studied had been exposed to killing after killing and fully expected to get killed and don’t hesitate to shoot anybody, and were not the least concerned about innocent bystanders. They typically displayed no moral or ethical restraints in using firearms. In fact, the street combat veterans survived by developing a shoot-first mentality.

The study concluded that police officers can never be assured that a criminal is unarmed until they have thoroughly searched the person and his/her surroundings themselves. Nor, in the interest of personal safety, can officers let their guards down in any type of law enforcement situation.

In conclusion, none of the criminals studied was hindered by any law, federal, state or local, established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws. Police officers faced with an armed criminal who hesitates while he/she decides to shoot or don’t shoot will likely find himself/herself a potentially deadly split second or more behind the criminal who has no hesitation whatsoever about pulling the trigger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. And your point being......
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There are still anti-gun bigots quoting that gun shows are the source of many guns
This and others clearly debunk that, thought the anti gun bigots will never acknowledge it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. And you are just SO excited about it, aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I am, killing stupid rumors one at a time.(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't see how this "debunks"
the myth of the gun show loophole. It sure proves that homicidal assholes have easy access to guns, some of which are probably bought at gun shows. But that doesn't bother you a bit, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Can you explain
Exactly what the "gun show loophole " is ? Do you even understand what is being discussed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Read the article.
From the article:

What researchers found was that handguns were used in the assaults on officers and all but one were obtained illegally. None of the firearms in the study was obtained from gun shows. None of the offenders pick a particular type of gun to use because he/she felt it would do the most damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. not my fucking problem. people who want weed find it,
crack seems to be available. If you want to impact crime supply side is not your path. If you want to look busy passing worthless laws are the way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Your reply does not make any sense to me. I get the feeling you are trying to make a point,
but you don't know how to word the point you wish to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Another drive by posting. I'm guessing you'll tuck tail and run away now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. She is a funny little thing isn't she?
Kind of reminds me of a Pomeranian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. There is that one-track mind again.
You should try some facts, they're good for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R for the fairy tale of the "Gunshow Loophole". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Gun Show Loophole For Dummies
I'm not sure what the exact number is but several states (Colorado included) do not regulate the private sale of fire arms.

IOW I can put an add in the local paper (there's actually only one in today's paper) and sell my gun to who ever shows up as long as I have no reason to believe he/she is a prohibited person. Closing the "gun loophole" would prohibit such sales at gun shows but would do nothing to regulate private sales out side of a gun show. So the guy who wants to sell (or buy) his gun W/out paper work will just continue to to do so in the paper or at the flea market or at a garage sale.

Criminals (who can't own firearms and don't have a history of buying them at gun shows anyway) will continue to buy them from the crack head who stole it from you.

Long story short nothing will change and in 5 years the grabbers will try to outlaw all private sales.

When they do criminals (who can't own firearms and don't have a history of buying them in private sales anyway) will continue to buy them from the crack head who stole it from you.

Now you understand "the gun show loophole"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Small correction..
As a private seller, there are only two things you should ask a potential buyer- their age (in some states, private sales of long guns to those under 18 and handguns to those under 21 is illegal) and whether the person is a resident in the same state you are (selling to an out of state buyer usually requires the services of an FFL- unless one or both of you are holders of C&R licenses.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No correction
In Colorado I can sell you a weapon as long as I do not reasonably believe that you are a prohibited person I am not required to ascertain your state of residency nor am I required to to ascertain your age and that's what I stated.

Now I respect your right to ask such questions prior to disposing of your firearms but it isn't the law here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Right.. maybe not in CO, but in others, yes.
In some states it's a crime to 'knowingly' provide a long gun to those under 18, handgun to those under 21, in other states, there's no 'knowingly', your ignorance isn't relevant.

See CO law-

"(1) (a) Any person who intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly provides a handgun with or without remuneration to any person under the age of eighteen years in violation of section 18-12-108.5 or any person who knows of such juvenile's conduct which violates section 18-12-108.5 and fails to make reasonable efforts to prevent such violation commits the crime of unlawfully providing a handgun to a juvenile or permitting a juvenile to possess a handgun."

http://cbi.state.co.us/ic/statutes/18-12-108.7.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. I tracked down the original report from 2006...
Feel free to read all 170+ pages:


http://www.forcescience.org/fsinews/2006/12/new-findings-from-fbi-about-cop-attackers-their-weapons/

Violent encounters : a study of felonious assaults on our nation’s law enforcement officers / Anthony J. Pinizzotto, Edward F. Davis, Charles E. Miller III. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice : Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division : Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2006.


http://calgunlaws.com/Docs/CGL%20NEWS/Ch1-3FBIReport.PDF
http://calgunlaws.com/Docs/CGL%20NEWS/Chapter_Four_of%20_Violent_Encounters_%20FBI_Report.PDF
http://calgunlaws.com/Docs/CGL%20NEWS/Ch5-6FBIReport.PDF
http://calgunlaws.com/Docs/CGL%20NEWS/Ch7FBIReport.PDF
http://calgunlaws.com/Docs/CGL%20NEWS/Ch8-9FBIReport.PDF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Sweet! Thanks, iconoclast!
I thought the findings sounded familiar, because I'd read references to a study that sounded eerily similar, but I could never find the actual report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Treo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thank you sir NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC