|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:12 PM Original message |
Some gun shops see more interest in accessories (esp extended magazines) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. the usual paranoid response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. True - just hope the dingbats who believe this crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. So is anyone trying to ban them, or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Why is it paranoid. McCarthy proposed a bill to ban both high capacity AND standard capacity mags. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why rush to buy something if you think it's going to become illegal soon? Must be those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Simple. If Hi-cap or extended magazines are banned ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. In Ohio a gun that holds 31 rounds is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yep makes perfect sense to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. That's like calling a Volkswagen pulling a trailer a race car... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Thing is, McCarthy et al aren't trying to ban 31-rounders; they are trying to outlaw *11* rounders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. The problem w/ antis is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I believe the "Brady II" bill in 1994 (S.1878) would have banned anything over 6 rounds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 08:07 PM Original message |
Where the BC wants to go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Where the BC wants to go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 09:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. We can all be from Joisey . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
34. "In Ohio a gun that holds 31 rounds is," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. McCarthy is trying to ban you from selling those mags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. The same reason people started hoarding silver coins in 1964. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. That's essentially correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. They won't be illegal. IF (and highly unlikely) anything passes it will ban new sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Or more accurately , new production |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well they have been proven effective on 9 year-old girls. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I was reading account in a just released book about Luby's massacre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. The Virginia Tech shooter also used lots of standard-capacity magazines, not extended mags. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. I;m glad I already bought the ones I wanted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. Hope they're buying them with cash. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. Extended magazines should be outlawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. One simple word, goddess40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. rotflmao! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Projection, Accusation AND Authoritarianism...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. If you would have spotted an ad strawminem at the same time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Arrest those voters too, dammit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Ever been target shooting with a mag fed handgun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. " I can think of no other reason for their existence. And the "I use it only for target practice"" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
31. Just goes to show you how the gun obsessed think. We need tougher laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. "We need tougher laws." Really, we need to be more like Mexico, Nigeria or Jamaica? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-11 11:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Is that what you are afraid of with tougher laws? That's not likely unless one is in the drug trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC