|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:06 AM Original message |
Should the proposed magazine restrictions apply to LEOs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Francis Marion (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Yes. Let the establishment live by its own rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
2. Sure, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Fine. As long as they don't apply to Libras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Is that the *new* Libras, or the old ones? Ophiucutucututu-whatever notwithstanding.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clffrdjk (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
6. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamin lib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. Considering that less than 2% ever fire their weapon on duty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I'm sure that 2% cares. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, if civilians are limited to 10 rounds, cops should also be limited ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remmah2 (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm for limiting magazine capacity for criminals first. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. No, nor to the military = they have a reason to have extended mags. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I may "need to" as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowrider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. How about when the cop punches out for the day. Are they now limited? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Even better.. how about retired cops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Can you point to a single incident in which the 32nd or 33rd round from a police pistol made... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. *cackles evilly* n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Since the reason to ban them has repeatedly been given as: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. why wouldnt a civilian need to fire repeatedly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 04:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
27. You really do walk into right into these things, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. LEO's are civilians. If guns with post-Civil-War magazine capacities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
17. Of course. It's not uncommon for police to lose their weapons, or have them stolen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-27-11 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
21. They should absolutely apply to law enforcement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
appal_jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. +1, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. They'd shit squid jigs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 02:52 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I can't say it one time fast. But it's still my fave line of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-28-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Results will vary depending on jig orientation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC