Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can't own gun means can't own bullets CT Senate sends ban for house approval

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:16 PM
Original message
Can't own gun means can't own bullets CT Senate sends ban for house approval
HARTFORD — State lawmakers are looking to take ammunition out of the hands of anyone who cannot legally possess firearms.

On Thursday, the Senate voted 21-13 to enact such a ban, sending the measure to the House for final action in the legislature, provided the legislation is not amended.

Supporters and opponents debated the rationale for the limited ammunition ban and its implications on the state and federal constitutional rights to bear arms.

Sen. Kevin D. Witkos, R-Canton, a police sergeant, argued the legislation makes sense, and the proposed prohibition will protect public safety.

http://www.rep-am.com/news/connecticut/560667.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fair enough - as long as the prohibition is fairly and correctly applied to the individual
I would consider it unfair, however, if they piled on both charges for a person caught with both items; seems like that would be double-dipping...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. USC 922 specifies both..
Unless there's something hinky like requiring a background check for ammunition, sounds reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. My neighborhood was so tough
they inserted the bullets manually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Your whole neighborhood was Chuck Norris?! Eeeep! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If Chuck Norris
owned my neighborhood and hell, he'd rent out my neighborhood and live in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. since it is federal law
why be redundant? Just turn them over to the feds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC