Concealed Weapons Permit Holder VS Would-Be Armed Robber.

http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=636359

"the victim was sitting in his car in the store parking lot when a man with a gun tried to rob him. Nunn says the victim shot the robber, who then fled the scene wounded."

This is why some people chose to carry a gun.

Just because you have a fire extinguisher in your house, it doesn't make you a wanna be fireman. It makes you prepared.

You can get in an argument with some dude and pop a cap in his ass, then say he tried to rob you. Who's gonna know? :D

The cops who investigate the incident might figure it out. A lot would depend on your prior criminal history and the legal status of your firearm. I think you'll find that many people who would "get in an argument with some dude and pop a cap in his ass" will also have a history that doesn't bear much close scrutiny.

Yeah, better to just take one for the team, right? Just throw yourself on the mugger's mercy in the interest of the general welfare.

"...being necessary to the security of a free state". And people who look like scary muggers make me feel insecure. :thumbsup:

...you are pretty much certain to be on the wrong side of an issue, as you clearly demonstrate on a regular basis.

Take your Brady Bunch nonsense somewhere else :D

a real threat. So you don't have to fear ccw or self defense laws.

You have a right to defend your SELF, not your FEELINGS.

An acquaintance once wondered why I carry a licensed pistol. She asked, "Have you ever been mugged?". I replied, "No. My house has never burned down, either. But I own fire extinguishers." Same principle.

Neither have I.

Because they didn't have a fire extinguisher when a small fire got out of control and they tried to fight the fire with a dish rag.

I know someone else who's child accicently drown in their pool.

Nice try though....

Carbon tetrachloride was a common cleaning fluid, and up until the '60s also used as a fire extinguishing agent.





Carbon tetrachloride has practically no flammability at lower temperatures. Under high temperatures in air, it forms poisonous the poisonous gas, phosgene. Phosgene was one of the predominant gasses used during World War One. The fact that high temperatures cause it to react to produce phosgene made it especially hazardous when used against fires in confined spaces. It has killed people.

My point exactly. :D

continue manufacturing it.

It was banned for environmental concerns along with a host of other CFC's, etc as "ozone depleting chemicals." It was NOT banned for killing people as a fire extinguisher. HALON based fire extinguishing systems have always excelled and controlling fuel and electrical fires. One of their advantages is they do not contaminate the equipment being protected, as would a dry chemical extinguisher.

Like a great many other things misused by people who disregard instructions. They make personal injury lawyers rich and the rest of us suffer inane safety warnings like, "Do not attempt to stop the chain on the chainsaw with your genitals." All this because juries feel compelled to reward stupid people with other peoples' money.

The underlying premise to the Darwin Awards was neatly summed up by Robert Heinlein.

"Stupidity cannot be cured with money, or through education, or by legislation. Stupidity is not a sin, the victim can't help being stupid. But stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death, there is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity."

"Carbon-tetrachloride extinguishers were withdrawn in the 1950s because of the chemical's toxicity–exposure to high concentrations damages the nervous system and internal organs."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_extinguisher

Sometimes facts suck.

Glad the intended victim was able to defend himself and was not harmed.

Hope the perpetrator survives and changes his ways.

Semper Fi,