Why someone who wants the AWB gone will vote for Kerry

Take a peek and see what you think. Contributions through the link are always welcome, too.

http://volunteer.johnkerry.com/mysite/?view=guest&ref=813083

Thanks for posting it.

Thanks for posting it.

A truly single-issue voter is never going to be happy. We all have to set priorities and base our choices on the issues that matter most.

:party: :toast:

to go on the Kerry/Edwards website and post an essay explaining why he was voting for Kerry and Edwards....no wonder he needs a gun...

Shame he can't post that on a forum for gun loonies like highroadrage.com or the like, eh?

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

There was absolutely nothing in the above post that warranted it's deletion.

deleted message say?
Thanks Tom

"That was a great article, it reflected my thoughts exactly."

- and -

"I can't imagine what __________ is littering the thread with."

I'll use _________ instead of the nickname we came up with, because apparently the nickname is too obvious.

I'm interested in this nickname "we" came up with. Who's "we"? Since the "nickname" (aka the personal attack) is obviously what got the original post deleted and what you know better than to repeat.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

And yet I'm not reduced to posting with blanks...or sniveling about a post of mine that got deleted....

"Butch up a little."
Wow...always interesting to see what's lurking behind the "pro gun democrat" mask, isn't it?

the fact that others have their own opinion. Interesting to know who can by a hypocrite in one thread and an angel in the next :yourock:

I also like the fact that I can be called a freeper in another thread and get away with it.

Oh, don't bother telling me you don't give a shit what I think, I know that. I have been told.

"Interesting to know who can by a hypocrite in one thread and an angel in the next"
And dishwater-dull to hear our "pro gun democrats" trot out the same tired whiny blah thread after thread after thread.

I find it funny as hell that our trigger happy friends have all these "opinions" but yet have nothing but excuses as to why they can't post them on the gun forums. They sure don't seem to have any trouble posting right wing horseshit HERE day and night.

Just as I find it hilarious that this was posted on the Kerry-Edwards website, but not where the real gumps panting over assault weapons are...I doubt there was anybody at all on the Kerry Edwards website who wasn't already planning to vote for Kerry and Edwards....just as I doubt that even 0.5% of those over there were jonesing for an assault weapon.

And, as I am not willing to go to hell myself just to spit in the devil's eye, I don't expect others to do so either.

I just find it amusing that it was posted on the Kerry/Edwards website (where one would presume everyone already was going to vote for Kerry/Edwards)...

and at Democratic Underground (where one would presume everyone already was going to vote for Kerry/Edwards {"pro gun democrats" excepted})...

but not, as far as we know, on forums where it might persuade someone who WAS having a spasm over the prospect of getting their sweaty shaky hands on an assault weapon....even though that seems to be the sort of person the essay was aimed at...and even though we've got trigger-happy chums in the thread who boast about visiting same...

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

As I said...butch up and stop tattling.

As I said ... grow up and stop whining.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

:)
:)
:)
:)
@

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

quoting someone is not a personal attack. Heavens to betsy, quelle idée ...

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I was just giggling over what you were defending.....

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

outsider it was obvious who he was referring to. You do know that by being rude to everyone that disagrees with your interpretation of what it means to be a Progressive and/or a Democrat you alienate those that you should want on your side. I can't see why you have not been banned.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

"lying hysterical fuckwit" then you should hit the alert button, and I guess alert yourself while you are at it.

If you feel that being a Progressive or a Democrat means the same thing in all parts of this nation, you are quite mistaken.

and now you want to snivel about it.....

"If you feel that being a Progressive or a Democrat means the same thing in all parts of this nation"
I know being a liar is the same in all parts....and we see it here every damn day from our "pro gun democrats."

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

and alert....

"I suspect a lie is anything you do not agree with."
No, that's the RKBAers definition.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

You do know that by being rude to everyone that disagrees with your interpretation of what it means to be a Progressive and/or a Democrat you alienate those that you should want on your side.

Who might they be?

All I see is an unfounded and unsound premise ("being rude to everyone that disagrees with your interpretation of what it means to be a Progressive and/or a Democrat") followed by some hypothesis of what might happen if the premise ceased to be true.

Well the premise isn't true. But even if it were, and then it ceased to be, I'm not seeing what change might occur in terms of outcome.

Hmm. MrBenchley becomes the model of sweet reason and decorum in all places at all times and in all circumstances and all company ... and all the "pro-gun democrats" see the light.

Oddly enough, I've never doubted that they see the light. So I'm not sure what's supposed to change there.

about whether our message is getting out, isn't it?

Meanwhile, I still yet to see why I want dishonest subliterate trigger-happy right wing buffoons on MY side....under any weather. I got pretty much every liberal or moderate I ever heard of, most elected Democrats (save a few Zell-type Dinos), the Presidential ticket, and pretty much every group of sane people in America on my side now as it is.

The "pro gun democrats" can keep the stentorian, Ted Nugent and the Aryan Nation all to themselves...

rude in these parts. It may be a regional thing.

especially the public figures peddling this bogus "gun rights" horseshit...

comments but as a progressive Democrat we all have opinions that can be heard on this forum wherein we can disagree and still be on the same side. Lunabushes post says it all. I think there must be something wrong with my computer, This is the 4th time I have replied to a wrong post. ?

you sure seem to have nothing I find worth hearing...

"I think there must be something wrong with my computer"
Garbage in, garbage out.....

an insult is really nice of you. Kind of stinks doesn't it?

youy sure got a mouthful of tedious blah....

"Kind of stinks doesn't it? "
What about the wretched RKBA horseshit doesn't? It's utterly dishonest, but it has some of the worst public figures on earth pushing it...

that it is regarded as bad form to specify that one has someone "on ignore"?

At least one rule comes with a formal warning not to "come up with cute ways of skirting around the spirit of this rule". I kind of figure that this applies to most rules in life, mutatis mutandis, at least if one is not actually seeking to seriously annoy the rule-enforcers -- or the people for whose benefit the rule was made.

Maybe if so many people didn't have him on their Ignore list (about 20 at my last count) then "Iggy" wouldn't be such an obvious nickname.

The thing is, you see, that I don't actually give a shit whom you have on ignore, or why, or how many other people do. That's entirely your business, and not something that interests me even remotely ... except to the extent that, being the curious sort that I am, I wonder to myself at why someone who plans to ignore the interlocutors present bothers joining a discussion ...

And the other thing is that I just don't understand why anyone would decide to ignore someone ... and then spend so much time talking about, and very obviously directly to, the someone being ignored. I say rather disingenuously that I don't understand this ...

Coming to the defense of a jerk who nobody likes doesn't reflect well upon you.

Whew. How many targets can ya hit with one false premise-based personal attack stone??

I've wasted twenty precious seconds of my day talking about that guy.

because some of the lamer of our trigger-happy friends are hiding behind ignore.

Of course, as I enjoy pointing out, them putting me on ignore has no downside for me.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

See the little dotted lines that lead from one yellow box to another? Those indicate which post was in response to which other post. It also says in the heading of each post which post it was in response to.

In the case of post #17 which you are complaining about, it was in reply to post #15, and was in direct, pertinent, and specific response to that post. You do understand what "response" means, don't you?

:dunce:

becomes a little more humble. Until then, please take my responses as one always does, with much indignation. Have you applied for moderation? you would be GREAT.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

But I'm sure you must be proud, standing tall to defend a tombstone.

rule on the Ignore list. We went round and round about this and you were adamant that this would continue.

For those interested. You may not, no matter how cutely, refer to someone being on your ignore list.

Know the DU rules - they are your friend.

edit - r to you to make it your

And everyone at THR knows that I support Kerry.

Hint for the busybodies: my username at THR is NOT Romulus . . . .

I'm sure I believe you...thousands wouldn't....

"my username at THR is NOT Romulus"
Harpo? MarcelMarceau? Henry? Yarnell?

==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2004 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

messages in it.

is going to post this on a gun owner's forum?

as to why they can't post something like this on gun owners' forum...

but those forums are lousy with attacks on Kerry that go unanswered....

Speaks volumes about our RKBAers, don't it?

although they're deep in viscous liquids over the frustration of not having assault weapons...

Amazingly, gun nuts also seem to be the only people in America unaware of what a pack of lies the Slime Boatters are...but then lies seem to be the RKBA stock in trade....

because it looks as if you are so lonely that you are posting to yourself to make it appear as of someone is eager to speak with you. It brought a tear to my eye.:cry:

Are you lonesome bench?

I'm just enjoying pointing out what our "pro gun democrats" are REALLY all about.

because you seem like someone who is really lonely and talks to himself...or like someone with a really bad case of diarrhea...or like some who is lonely and talks to himself and has a really bad case of diarrhea.

everything they say is just plain old shit they're parroting from assholes like these...

Is anybody surprised? Me neither.

"For 35 years, ever since the Democratic Party got its liberal reputation from the civil rights movement and the Vietnam War, Democratic candidates for statewide office in Arkansas have needed to establish their culturally conservative bona fides by killing something"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=78262&mesg_id=78262

All gun owners are racists.

But then I've never pretended otherwise....

It says it, plain as day, where everyone can see it. All gun owners are racists.

That's clearly exactly what it says. All gun owners are racists.

It's right there for everyone to read for themselves. All gun owners are racists.

But hey, ask me next if I enjoy kicking threads that show what our "pro gun democrats" are REALLY all about....

I still think you should get that "All gun owners are racist" thread stickied.

when you say "pro gun democrat?" Are you saying that the person you're referring to isn't really pro-gun?

Our trigger happy chums keep telling us there's millions of gun crazed Democrats who are just waiting to hear something like this...but the gun nut forums are clogged with nothing but the most ignorant freeper shit.....

Why, you'd almost think our RKBAers were lying or utterly ignorant(snicker).

Again, this brave essay is not to be found on any gun nut forum that I see....although such places are awash with dittohead lies and hysteria...

But then who here didn't know that the folks who really want the AWB gone are no more likely to vote Democratic than they are to grow wings and take to the skies? Still, it's fun to see our "pro gun democrats" confirm that.

are racists and will obviously vote for their fellow gun owners George Bush and Dick Cheney.

But then with every passing day it grows more obvious...

Is he a racist too? I don't think I could vote for a racist gun owner.

and plans to close the gun show loophole...somehow I doubt he thinks you ARE voting for him, feeb....

Alan Keyes seems a lot more YOUR speed....and you'll notice hanging around with racist fuckwits like Pat Buchanan or blathering about how wrong the civil rights movement is don't bother Keyes a bit, either.

Aren't all gun owners racist?

"somehow I doubt he thinks you ARE voting for him, feeb...."

Well, he doesn't know me, so I doubt he thinks one way or the other on the subject.

"Alan Keyes seems a lot more YOUR speed...."

Nah. He's not nearly pro-gun enough for me.

"he doesn't know me"
Lucky John Kerry....

"Lucky John Kerry...."

I don't know. I think Kerry could use someone knowledgeable to help his people craft gun control that isn't moronic like the AWB and that S.429 bill. I think I'm his man.

"I think Kerry could use someone knowledgeable"
Hahahahahahahahahaha....

"I think Kerry could use someone knowledgeable"
Hahahahahahahahahaha....

What?

although those cesspools are lousy with dittohead propaganda...

Our "pro gun democrats" must be migthy grateful that a "liberal progressive" (snicker) like Alan Keyes has joined their bogus cause...

Why you'd almost think that the whole point of this essay was not to convince people to vote for Kerry and Edwards at all...given that it's only posted where people who are already voting for Kerry and Edwards are.

Guess none of our trigger happy chums have to be pragmatic in any way...or else they all think "pragmatic" means "we have no facts to support our cause so just shut up."

(or "gob smacked" as our British friends say) to discover that this swell essay has STILL not been posted on any gun owners' forum....

Even though we've been assured that there are just scads of moderate gun-toting folks who would vote for Kerry if only they heard words of reassurance such as these...of course those same people also pretend that banning assault weapons represents some sort of tyranny, so perhaps honesty isn't their long suit.

By the way, highroadrage has a dimwitted essay claiming that John Kerry deliberately let the Viet Cong wound him superficially during Viet Nam so that 35 years later he could have Purple Hearts when he began his sinister bid to seize power from God's chosen drunk. But hey, I guess if you're dumb enough to believe NRA propaganda, you'll swallow ANY shit.

But of course, on the gun owner forums where folks are just wetting themselves with frustration because they can't get their hands on an assault weapon, there's no sign of this little snookums...

Hilariously, there's at least one where the assorted loonies thought Alan Keyes' machine gun comment was brilliant and would tip the race...drawing all those undecided who were hoiping that Wilmette could be as safe and peaceful as the West Bank (snicker) over to the crazy carpetbagger's cause....

on any gun owner forum....although those places are loaded down with dittomonkey horseshit....

to find mindless, dishonest crap attacking liberal Democrats to post here, for whatever bizarre reason....but they can't post something like that THERE.

Speaks volumes, doesn't it?

I think you're the only one "scouring" those websites.