Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes to Palestine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 09:21 AM
Original message
Yes to Palestine
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 09:22 AM by bemildred
Later this month, the Palestinian Authority intends to go before the United Nations to request recognition of an independent Palestinian state. Although there is strong backing for the bid, the United States, in the name of supporting Israel, has stated its willingness to use its Security Council veto power to keep the Palestinians from joining the U.N. as a full voting member. The U.S. has also refused to join in a more symbolic General Assembly vote that could change the Palestinians' status from a "nonvoting observer entity" to a "nonvoting observer state."

Here are five reasons why the U.S. should support the Palestinian bid and not exercise its veto at the U.N.

Negotiations have failed.

Two decades of negotiations have not brought the Palestinians a state of their own. Israelis and Palestinians blame each other for the current impasse.

But the question of who is at fault is irrelevant. What matters is that in 1993, when the Oslo accords set up a framework for a negotiated settlement for a two-state solution, there were a little more than 100,000 Israeli settlers living in the West Bank. Now that number stands at more than 300,000. According to the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem, about half a million Israelis now live "over the Green Line" in what is designated as the future Palestinian state. Every day the Palestinians wait for a negotiated state, another sliver of that state is absorbed into Israel. A few more years and practically nothing will remain.


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-0915-aslan-palestinian-vote-20110915,0,3871067.story
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ahh, but NY-9 provides one reason to veto that will over-ride all the reasons...
...not to veto; our politicians are scared shitless
of losing their seats.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
holdencaufield Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just a couple of observations...
"...about half a million Israelis now live "over the Green Line" in what is designated as the future Palestinian state..."

Designated by whom? The land over the Green Line belonged to Jordan in '67 -- they have made it clear they no longer wish to own it. So, where is it written that the "Green Line" is the border?


"...Every day the Palestinians wait for a negotiated state, another sliver of that state is absorbed into Israel. A few more years and practically nothing will remain..."

A really good reason to come to the table and talk to Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is that a rhetorical question, or do you really not know?
The Green Line is commonly used as the basis of a political settlement, the Israeli government talks that way, 1967 armistice line "with swaps". One sees it ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
holdencaufield Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But never settled
Why would Israel (or the Palestinians for that matter) accept a border that isn't to their benefit? Neither side can impose their will on the other other and the UN can't force the issue. So -- NEGOTIATION is the only way to settle the border which won't be on the original '67 Green Line.

These little amateur-theatricals at the UN aren't going to bring either side to the table -- it's designed to drive them further away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Who the heck said "settled"? The question was "Designated by whom?"
Not "settled by whom?"

The outcome of the UN theatrics appears to me to be very much in doubt. We have a week to go and the noise machine is just really starting to crank up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
holdencaufield Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They've always been in doubt
As much as they've love to pimpslap Israel, a lot of countries must realise that if the Palestinians can pull this off, why not the Kurds in Iraq and Syria, the Chechens in Russia, the Nubians in Kenya, Muslim separatists in Kashmir, Rohingyas in Myanmar...?

A declaration of statehood and full admission to the UN will open up a huge can of currently stateless worms that these countries don't want opened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC