Indian American ISM Activist To Sue Israel

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0311/S00238.htm

International Solidarity Movement volunteer Radhika Sainath, from Orange County, California is suing the state of Israel on Thursday, November 27 for unlawful imprisonment, negligence and breach of obligations. Leading human rights lawyer Shamai Liebowitz will be representing Ms. Sainath, who was seized by Israeli soldiers last November in the olive groves of the West Bank village Jayyous.

Ms. Sainath will testify against the gross misconduct of Israeli authorities in handling her arrest, during which she was prohibited from calling her lawyer, not served with an arrest warrant and transferred to multiple holding centers over 48 hours, causing her to suffer mental trauma and agony.

referred to in the article Indian-American woman confronts Israeli Terror with nonviolence

DU thread on that story here

will probably be branded a "traitor" and "misguided"...

n/t

:nopity:

What's the point?

families get to sue for mental trauma and agony ??


hmmm???

could get some frozen Hamas funds .... ???

so, where do the victims and their families go to
to sue for mental trauma and agony against the
mindless inhuman palestinian terrorist brutality ??

Is it really that difficult?

Why make fun of the person's suffering and agony? I don't understand it.

but feel free to answer my question or we can go in
circles for the next year....or until the next
ISM requiem.

that my question was too difficult for you?

One more time: Why make fun of someone's sufferings?

Suing from people who have little to nothing because you keep voting for people who take away what little that they have. That idea sounds funny as heck.

Don't forget they had Uncle Saddam spending billions on them, as well as multi-millionaire Arafat, their devine protector, sure to bail them out of any trouble.

The fog settles and details like that become clearer and clearer.

so that's why Israeli planners kept demanding that the U.S. take out Saddam.

Yes the details get clearer each day.

is detained for two days during which her biggest complaint was being "transferred to {sic} multiple holding centers," and now has the gall to sue over it?

She should be grateful that Israel recognized she was a harmless non-com. This is war.

expecting to be treated decently and all ... what are they thinking?

But what I am saying is that war is inherently a dangerous and chaotic environment, and that anybody who voluntarily places themself in the midst of such of an environment runs an enormous risk, absent any sort of conspiracy against her.

present a danger to the society, eh?

she wasn't murdered, like how Rachel Corrie was bulldozed, or when they shot Tom Hurndall in the head.

Then again, I guess there is still time to take her out, eh?

and be a peace activist there? I think you'd quickly find that the natural mortality rate for so-called neutrals who put themselves between two beligerent parties in a war zone is a lot higher than you'd care to believe and really requires no malice aforethought.

and risk being murdered by an Israeli terrorist like the ones that killed Rachel or Tom, or the one who shot Brian Avery in the face.

terrorists or otherwise, in Falluja. But then, what do I know?

Are you implying that there aren't any inherent risks to being in a war zone? That conscientious objectors can, unless they are deliberately targeted, walk freely between two or more belligerent factions on a battlefield and not run a very high risk of being wounded or killed?

are deliberately targeted for murder by Israeli Occupation Forces - that's the point.

negligent homicide, or an opportunist of the moment
some Israely soldier who just like to kill a peacenik
spur of the moment ...

had to be given a green-light from somewhere, don't you think?

they are getting away with it, so why not deliberately target them? With an American media standing by pretending like these things don't happen, and a right-wing administration ready to forgive and (quickly) forget any and all "mishaps" (woops, did we bulldoze one of your citizens to death?), why not keep on gunning them down?

..

I used to have an open mind to the idea that Rachael Corrie's death was an accident.

That is, I had that open mind until a wave of attacks against people from ISM (and one time, their visiting parents) took place.

Mobuto, IDF was able to keep from killing the activists before. Now, they suddenly can't help but kill or injure them. I don't buy it.

I guess that leaves force (which I approve of), which I assume you also disapprove of. What then, if anything, would you suggest?

Should have been arrested also. There should have been a contingent of Army medics and social works, psychologists, translators and signal corpsmen, to attend to her every need. Then they could have arrested her a put her in an nice comfy cell, with her favorite foods, entertainment, music and frequent visits form ISM comrades.

Of course the bill for her detention would be payable to the IDF. Israel is short of funds, also. (on edit)

For what? Opposing a bulldozer illegally demolishing a house of a civilian in the OT (NOT Israeli land!)?

would you believe? Or maybe they'd just deport her as visa is expired.

wha-aaaaaaaaaaaaaatt ??? :wow::wow::wow::wow:

her own. Isn't it a fact?

my jaw cannot handle all of the occasions you make it drop to the floor with such surreal proclamations.

So, she should be arrested for the Peace 'Dozer(TM) endangering her life by charging towards her.. do you want the driver arrested as part of this too, since he was kinda sorta maybe partly doing the "endangering" involved here, or was that brave & heroic man just "defending himself against 'terrorism'"?

;)

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.