Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Craving for Cookies Cost Gaza Girl Her Life

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 11:16 PM
Original message
Craving for Cookies Cost Gaza Girl Her Life
http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2004%20News%20archives/April/24%20n/Craving%20for%20Cookies%20Cost%20Gaza%20Girl%20Her%20Life.htm

<edit>

Mona’s mother said she allowed her daughter to go out to buy biscuits because she believed the danger was further away. “She found the store closed and as she tried to return home they shot her dead,” Shifa said. She said a bullet fired by a soldier pierced her daughter’s stomach.

“My daughter hadn’t even finished her meal, she went out to buy something and just at that moment the Israeli soldiers opened fire on her and killed her,” she cried, her voice choked by her tears.

Mohammad Nassar, a medic at Jabalya Hospital, said the little girl held her hand over her gaping wound before she died, telling him she wanted to go home because her mother would be worried that she was late.

But the last words she uttered was, “Allah, there is only one God,” the tearful medic added. He wondered how such a young child “knew what people are supposed to say before death.”

Many children attended Mona’s funeral yesterday, among them Ghadir Sakr, also aged nine, who had gone to the morgue beforehand to plant a kiss on her slain friend’s forehead. “I used to play with her all the time. I came to see her for the last time before they bury her,” the weeping girl said.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. well this is from aljazeera
so I take it with a grain of salt. But if true, this is really sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. your condiments might go better with the actual Al-Jazeera
Edited on Sun Apr-25-04 04:57 AM by thebigidea
And I wish that for once, someone would explain exactly WHAT Al-Jazeera was lying about. "They're the FOX news of the ME!"

Yeah, ok - but WHY? A list of errors they've made would be nice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Don't hold your breath for an answer....
Edited on Sun Apr-25-04 10:18 AM by lefty_mcduff
I haven't found their coverage any less unreliable than, than say CNN. CNN won't show bodies of Arab civiians because it may upset the West's delecate notions of what is going on in Iraq. Al-Jazeera shows the bodies on TV to show *what* is going on in Iraq, from an Arab perspective. It is not a question on whether or not the bodies exist.

From a Western perspective Al-Jazeera can be viewed as anti-US, but no less than CNN can be viewed as anti-Arab from an Arab perspective.

News networks in the West are also relying morea and more on Al-Jazeera for a lot of their coverage because A) Western reporters are wisely staying within fortified US military positons or 'embeded' with the US military, and B) Al-Jazeera has a pipeline to the Arab world that the western news sources neglected to build.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. The story is from Reuters.
Still, the reliability of the source won't keep the US media from mostly ignoring it.

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=498470§ion=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ah yes the brave Israeli soldiers they must be so proud of their ability
Edited on Sat Apr-24-04 11:28 PM by LibertyorDeath
to shoot children & unarmed civilians of all ages.

Such fine work they do protecting the homeland.

There's nothing like getting up early putting on your flack Jacket & heading off to kill some children.

And this will make Israel safer how????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellboy Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Another victim of Arafat's foreign (terror) policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's rich.
It seems to me that an occupying force in an occupied territory has a responsibility for the safety and well-being for the civilians in the area. Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellboy Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You mean occupying force of another country. This isn't another
country. It's more of a police action. Arafat is supposed to be policing the territories but oops, he's using the policemen as terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah - Arafat has a real chance of 'policing'
the 'territories' while under house arrest in his bombed out complex. And when the Palestinian security forces are often paraded through the streets by IDF forces (with hands on heads) thus removing any semblance of authority. And BTW - you should check the Geneva Convention. Contrary to your claims, it is COMPLETELY Israel's responsibility to protect civilians in 'occupied territories'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellboy Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. According to the Geneva accords, Arafat is responsible for
Edited on Sun Apr-25-04 10:48 AM by hellboy
policing the territories. He won't do it so Israel is stuck doing it. And remember, Israel occupied the territories after arafat and Hamas slaughtered Israelis with a bunch of bombings.

Clinton tried to be an honest peace broker but Arafat walked away from the negotiation table and started intifada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty_mcduff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow.
Middle East for Dummies.

Tanx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe he should sign up for...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Israel occupied the WB in 1967...
Hamas was founded somewhat later, boy.

<snip>
In 1987, the Arabs living in the territories occupied by Israeli in the 6-Day war began a series of riots and violent confrontations known as the Intifadeh, a movement quite independent from PLO leadership. Soon after, Islamic militants founded the Hamas movement, which was at first given some encouragement by Israel, as a means of countering the influence of the PLO, and perhaps because the opposition of the Hamas to an international conference that would adjudicate the problem of Palestine, coincided with the policies of the Shamir government.
</snip>

http://www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm

It might be helpful to read some history instead of mis-representing it, boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walmartsucks Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. He certainly had
A real chance of policing prior to being put under virtual house arrest at his bombed out complex, but he didn't seem to take much interest in it at that time either. And about that Geneva Convention...isn't that the one that says you aren't supposed to target women and children on buses, at restaurants, in schools, at shopping malls, etc.? Or does it only apply to one side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC