|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:15 AM Original message |
What's so hard to understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 04:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. It is a form of corrosion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. Tell you what Willbill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. high temperature sulfidation of steel effects [sic] steel by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. So how does it prove thermate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Doesn't thermate usually include significant amounts of barium nitrate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Did Professor Jones find any barium compounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I do not remember him mentioning barium, just iron and sulfur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Good luck nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. You're close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The characterization of the WTC steel as "evaporated" came from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Can you provide a link where Dr Barnett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Google "evaporated" and "Barnett" and "steel" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Understandable confusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "I googled and found no reference " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Dr. Barnett does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. So when the good Dr learned about all the possible sources of sulfur... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. There is plenty of doubt where the sulfur came from. They're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. This is an interesting question, indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:46 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. CarefulPlease Did you hear? WP is reporting a massive cover-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 03:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. What can I say? Surely, that proves the thermate hypothesis. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 03:52 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. If you say it does then of course it does. If you say it doesn't than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. There was no reasonable answer in 22. There was a laundry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. You are acknowledging that there is no evidence for thermate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bryan Sacks (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. no evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. We were talking about the link in post 22. Thermate is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:35 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Could you please post the evidence that thermate is the source? ( n/t ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Asked and answered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I have read Jones and I did watch the C-Span program. Neither proves it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 04:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Yes it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. OK, sorry. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Did you even read what you posted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Well, the sources of sulfur were studied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Ah, right. "Case Closed".... NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Sulphur was not unusual; the long lasting fires were. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. So why didn't they allow an investigation? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Pet goat, did you hear the news? The war is over and we won. WP is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 04:09 AM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Who says they did not allow an investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:29 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. There has been no investigation. You are now driven to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. How ironic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. There is no evidence of the studies you assume. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. He clearly did not assume anything. You did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 12:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. From the lack of evidence of any studies, I hypothesize that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Secret Investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. If someone is doing it, it's a secret. even to you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. You're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. The WPI team asked to do further studies. They got no funds. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Really? Care to provide a link? (n/t0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 04:36 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Read FEMA Appendix C. It says more study is needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 05:55 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. You seem to be a reasonably intelligent person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. You're continued insistence that invisible jewish elves are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Actually based on the FEMA report it is unlikely anyone is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. The eutectic sulfidation attack was an unusual event, not an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 08:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Yes, but sulfur is sulfur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #64 |
83. Very interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Thermate is a more satisfactory source because the sulfur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Take a piece of hot steel, sprinkle it with powered gypsum ,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I'd ask spooked to do it, but since it would only get him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 07:09 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. No - the sulfur is for increased incendiary effects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. The paragraph you cite is about the military uses of thermite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. No - thermite is used to weld constructively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. It's your cite. The paragraph is about the military uses of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-04-06 08:40 AM Response to Reply #87 |
99. A few questions, if you don't mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-05-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #87 |
100. What happened to you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
97. "NIST had $20 million and didn't do it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
65. How much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. NIST got $20 million; FEMA got $650 k nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. chump change n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #72 |
86. 9CR initially got something like $3 million; ultimately $15 mill nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. as a reference to how much this really is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:38 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. "911 myths" is bogus.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
70. Care to provide any evidence or reasonable argument to support that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. It is a straw man extravaganza |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:57 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Hardly. It deals with actual claims, not made up ones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:44 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Anyone can find a "claim" on "the internets" & "debunk" it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:18 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. You haven't provided any evidence to support your accusation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 03:14 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Do they have anything up at that site to refute the WP story yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
69. I doubt that they will. Why would they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Let the lesson begin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Aren't you insterested in learning something? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wouldn't it be great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
49. The class is over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 05:23 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. By george I think you're right quickesst. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Petgoat is like one of those karate action stars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:46 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. You're too kind and will give me a swole head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. No more hiding Petgoat. Your cover is blown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Where did u get that goat graphic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. I could tell you but then I would have to kill you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:49 AM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Just as I thought, aha! ;)eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #73 |
85. Put mouse over image; right click |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 06:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Thanks for the laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I call em'.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:58 PM Response to Reply #62 |
71. Uh, you're confusing yourself with another identity here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 02:39 AM Response to Reply #55 |
77. ROTFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 05:36 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I almost.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:47 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. You're too kind, quick.eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-04-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #78 |
98. Looks like you misplaced your sympathies.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:11 AM Response to Reply #49 |
84. I realize folks like to cheer for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 05:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Not as much ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #84 |
96. Not a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC