The whole lot of em', complicit. Theyre like a classroom of kids lying to their teacher, no one can keep their lies straight and they giggle ,smirk, stutter and ramble when the teacher gets too close to the truth. And no, no one can stop " the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2001/washingtontimes091001.htmlHey Richard Clarke, why would dem' teurrests want to hurt us?
"Why would people conduct terrorism in the United States? One reason is blackmail. A major terrorist attack occurs involving chemical weapons or computers, then someone reliably says they did it and adds that, if the United States continues its support for Israel or eradicating coca on the Upper Huallaga valley in Peru or whatever, it will happen again"
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/pubs/lansdowne/clarke.htm"Why would anyone want to mount such an attack? "To extort us," he said. "To intimidate us. To get us to abandon our foreign policy --'Abandon Israel or else!'"
http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/clark.htm So what should we do with dese' turrists?
"Whereas I cannot go into detail about what actions the United States is taking to disrupt terrorist groups, the basic philosophy behind this policy mirrors community policing belief: Get them off the streets, round them up."
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/pubs/lansdowne/clarke.htmSomebody's quoted as saying that they walked into your office and almost immediately afterwards, the first words out of your mouth was "Al Qaeda.
Well, I assumed it was Al Qaeda. No one else had the intention of doing that. No one else that I knew of had the capability of doing that. So yes, as soon as it happened, I assumed it was Al Qaeda."
Because one of the things that surprises a lot of the public, I think, is that immediately after Sept. 11, the administration knew exactly who had done it. Was that why?
No. On the day of Sept. 11, then the day or two following, we had a very open mind. CIA and FBI were asked, "See if it's Hezbollah. See if it's Hamas. Don't assume it's Al Qaeda. Don't just assume it's Al Qaeda." Frankly, there was absolutely not a shred of evidence that it was anybody else. The evidence that it was Al Qaeda began just to be massive within days after the attack.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/interviews/clarke.html A massive body of evidence against al kada huh?? Is that in his book, cause I haven't seen it anywhere.