Something new for NIST to dwell upon...

NIST needs to rethink its "hole theory" regarding the south face of WTC7.

It seems there is an even greater "hole" in their whole theory...as in "erroneous".

Check it out: http://www.studyof911.com/articles/winstonwtc701/

Thanks for posting.

The very first pic on the site, the NYPD one - I've thought for a long time there was something rancid about it. If you embiggen it and look at the smoke blackened window areas it sure looks like the hand of Photoshop has waved it's magic. Roof of the Verizon building is pretty clean too, considering what had just happened.

NIST once again makes assumptions that are not in evidence.

Maybe it's time for me to dust off my WTC7 work, work I interrupted when Bolo
wrongfully claimed to have a picture of WTC tower debris in the WTC7 debris pile.

However, looking closely at the vertical columns of the WTC towers on the left in red, you can clearly see the spacing between the columns is wider than the columns themselves. Whereas, in the CNN video image, it clearly shows the vertical columns to be wider than the spacing separating them. That is just the opposite of the WTC tower columns. And don't try to tell me it is because of the angle at which you are viewing them laying down. You can still measure and tell either way. And where are the large, flat horizontal plates in the CNN video that can easily be seen holding the vertical columns upright and with the correct spacing in the image on the left? The horizontal cross-members seen in the CNN video image on the right are much, much thinner and underneath the vertical columns.

You are trying to compare apples and oranges. They are clearly not the same structures.