Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Imagine, if you will... Waking up on 9/11/2001 and finding out that there were four airliners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 10:02 PM
Original message
Imagine, if you will... Waking up on 9/11/2001 and finding out that there were four airliners
whose flight paths had changed drastically. Imagine that there was no communication from the airplanes. Imagine that NORAD scrambled oodles of fighters, F-15's, F-16's, heck, even a few F-18's just for good measure.

Now imagine that those four airplanes were shot down by American forces for nothing other than being catastrophically off course. Two shot down over Manhattan, crashing into buildings and streets, killing untold thousands. One shot down over DC, hitting the Washington Monument and toppling it before crashing into the Lincoln Monument, destroying both, and killing a large number of people. A very large number of innocent American Citizens, and who knows how many people from other countries.

What do you think we'd be saying in this forum today? How badly would be trashing whomever made such a decision, and how passionately would we be calling for that person or persons to be jailed for such monumental bad judgment?

There it is... the signpost on the left...

Every time I see someone post ANYTHING about NORAD or scrambled fighters I have to wonder to myself: Is that person saying that the United States Government should have SHOT DOWN four civilian airliners for being off course and failing to answer radio calls? Is that REALLY what the truthers mean when they say things like "Nineteen Arab cavedwellers defeated NORAD with nothing more than boxcutters"?

I can't wait to see what my favorite 9/11 forum posters have to say by way of an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huh?
What, are we supposed to chuck protocol and let NORAD make calls based on their gut or a coin toss? They failed us that day and 3000 *did* die! What the hell are you babbling about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Does the term "KAL 007" mean anything to you?

I remember folks getting pretty worked up over that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Tell me how they "failed" us.
Did they fail us by allowing three airplanes hit their targets?

And if that is the case, what would you say they should have done to keep those planes away from said targets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. They should have followed protocol (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. They did, except in a few cases...
...which served to accelerate the response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I keep hearing about these protocols
are these the non-existent protocols that say every time an airliner goes off course, loses comms or IFF that they are intercepted? Those protocols for which no actual evidence exists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey "Truthers", are you fucking chickens or what? No answer for whether we should have SHOT DOWN
those aircraft short of their targets?

Please tell me what you mean by "NORAD failed us". Can you at least give me that much?

I'm dyin' here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. where were the fighters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh wait... if there were no airplanes, there couldn't have been an action by NORAD
to stop the attack, could there?

Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. what action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. What are you trying to say?

"if there were no airplanes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I believe he is saying...
That there is zero evidence for the absurd "theory" of "no planes". Why? Are those more words you have trouble understanding? It is good that you are now asking when you do not understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Let's let him/her say what they mean. There certainly were ...

planes. Lots of 'em. Flyover planes. Planes that may have been used for various aspects of the operations -- e.g. to jam certain
electronics equipment (cell phones, non-perp cameras etc.), and of course there were cartoon planes. Also real helicopters ("Pat", in
Choopper 5 - where at least one of the live composites was made) and probably some cartoon ones too.

There were other flying objects/balls/birds? etc.

The evidence for planes is abundant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Flying Balls? I don't think you know anything about balls
Have you any evidence for your balls?

I suspect not, you never seem to have any evidence for any of your claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Don't let me distract you from your interest in cartoon planes,

flyover planes, and the ones that may have been used to jam cellphones and non-perp video cameras. You haven't lost interest in
them, have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. So yet another claim without proof?
The claims get more and more wild every day it seems... and never a thing to back them up. Tell me buddyboy, what do they call people in SE Texas that make wild claims all the time and never even try to back them up? They got a name for that down there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I have to believe that you actually don't believe any of this bullshit...
Edited on Sat Aug-22-09 10:58 AM by SDuderstadt
then I realize that you actually do. That's the absolutely frightening part.

Simple question...you often talk about DU in the past tense although your profile indicates you recently joined. Did you use to post here under a different name? If so, who were you in this ''prior life''?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Right. I actually don't believe any real planes crashed on 9/11, and ...

I have to believe that you know that too. It's just too silly and goofy to believe that a real plane could glide into and thru
a building as though the building weren't there, and I'm pretty sure the WTC buildings weren't made of Cool Whip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Flame bait? Because you can't debate?

Do you feel that you should be allowed to continue to insult me and other DUers without anything being done about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No, dude...it's not just because your claims are...
goofy, they're incredibly offensive to the victims of that day, they're an embarrassment to liberalism in general and to DU in particular.

And, as I've said before, they're not insults, it's utter contempt for your goofy, offensive bullshit. You remind of those ''We are change!'' knuckleheads who follow Bill Clinton around, calling him scum and embarrassing themselves before Bill shuts them down. Maybe you should demand to know why Clinton dismisses your goofy, offensive claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. How could NORAD have failed us if there were no airplanes in the first place?
CGI failure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I didn't say there were no planes
Though I have some doubts about the pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. ***Crickets*** and rightly so... cuz you have no answer. YET. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. can't shoot them down without interception
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Great, the Clowns' Investigation Team
The number 1 outfit when it comes to cherrypicking quotes and ignoring evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. NORAD didn't have "oodles of fighters"
Not sure how many "oodles" is but I doubt it is 20. Thats how many Air National Guard F-15s and F-16s fighters for the Continiental US. Zero USAF Fighters, because they turned the ADIZ mission over to the ANG in its entirely, and zero F-18s as they are all USN and USMC. 2001 was not 1951 and the air threat to the US ADIZ was not considered great enough to have any more than that. It still isnt.

When I say 20 that is how many ANG fighters were on alert. Armed, Fueled, avionics ready, pilots strapped into a recliner in a ready room. Everywhere else they were not. Pilots and groundcrew at home, or at training, planes in hangers, unfueled, weapons in bunkers, needing to be signed out, paperwork processed. It takes a LOT longer to "scramble" non alert aircraft...thats the whole reason to HAVE ALERT AIRCRAFT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Who ever said the first or second plane should have been intercepted?
Most people have questioned why AA 77 wasn't intercepted while flying around for ***45 minutes*** following the two WTC crashes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Imagine if you will...
that shit doesn't stink and looks like diamonds! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddyBoy Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Takes a vivid imagination to believe the OCT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Says the guy who claims no planes crashed on 9/11...
define irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
32. They weren't shot down because they were government planes..
NORAD knew it was happening. Why do you think the Air Force person didn't want to answer any questions while this was all happening. Then after all the plane crash...Now they offer their full cooperation. A simple review of the fact will tell you this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. WTF are you babbling about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Ahhh, So those pesky Canadians were in on it as well?
With their stupid better beer and health care... I knew they hated our freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Over their heads most likley (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our third quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC