Fifty questions on 9/11 By Pepe Escobar

It's September 11 all over again - eight years on. The George W Bush administration is out. The "global war on terror" is still on, renamed "overseas contingency operations" by the Barack Obama administration. Obama's "new strategy" - a war escalation - is in play in AfPak. Osama bin Laden may be dead or not. "Al-Qaeda" remains a catch-all ghost entity. September 11 - the neo-cons' "new Pearl Harbor" - remains the darkest jigsaw puzzle of the young 21st century.

It's useless to expect US corporate media and the ruling elites' political operatives to call for a true, in-depth investigation into the attacks on the US on September 11, 2001. Whitewash has been the norm. But even establishment highlight Dr Zbig "Grand Chessboard" Brzezinski, a former national security advisor, has
admitted to the US Senate that the post-9/11 "war on terror" is a "mythical historical narrative".

The following questions, some multi-part - and most totally ignored by the 9/11 Commission - are just the tip of the immense 9/11 iceberg. A hat tip goes to the indefatigable work of 911truth.org; whatreallyhappened.com; architects and engineers for 9/11 truth; the Italian documentary Zero: an investigation into 9/11; and Asia Times Online readers' e-mails.

None of these questions has been convincingly answered - according to the official narrative. It's up to US civil society to keep up the pressure. Eight years after the fact, one fundamental conclusion is imperative. The official narrative edifice of 9/11 is simply not acceptable.

..
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KI11Ak02.html

for no apparent reason.

It's true.

Just finished watch the US Open semis and was a bit bored, so I went through the list.

Each and every single of those questions have already been answered, some in greater detail than others, and yet truthers still parade it around. Also, some of the language used in this 'questionaire' is freaking hilarious. Just look at the description of Richard Reid for one.

EDIT: And some of them are just plane idiotic, such as the suggestion that Northrop Grumman had installed Global Hawk (how on earth they would have done that is beyond even my comprehenseion) in the hijacked planes.