Alien base on Mars? Secret government space station?

Sure looks like one of those to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTJt0LJZG2k&feature=player_embedded#at=114

Since at least 2005, a fellow named James P. Skipper has been misidentifying JPEG compression artifacts for buildings on Mars, and he has much better examples:

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2005/084/hale-civ-evidence.htm

Of course, government may be just finding out about it -- !!

But I'm sure we'll have a cya story on it as soon as they decide on one --


:evilgrin:

You want to go with?

:rofl:

disrupt? I'm the only one contributing :)


Anyway, we have room for another person if you would like to check out the structures first hand. I really only need one piece of data, your weight, so we can plan for our fuel properly. Oh, and yes you have more room than if you were in an airplane seat :hi:

We have to know by COB tomorrow...

Please!!

Like I said above, just neeed your weight so we can get the fuel just right...

then I'll give you the secret meeting place

I'll pay your way. One way ticket, right?

Then will be bringing back some materials, pictures, etc.,

You don't want to check out the Mars base?

Which one does it look like to you?

No idea which it is, but it's something.

... caused by multiple JPEG compression artifacts on top of digital enlargement and rotation artifacts, and a second image from a higher-resolution camera shows there's nothing unusual there:

http://www.universetoday.com/86497/proof-bio-station-alpha-is-just-an-image-artifact/

They did the same thing with the "Face" on Mars. The second images were just government cover-ups.

Did you even pause to consider the possibility that they weren't?

They also liked Ted Kennedy.

http://www.tampabayskeptics.org/Mars_morefaces.html

When it comes to the actual science being done with Mars imaging, additional images often show very interesting things. One I just read about today is some evidence of flowing water.

But anyway, you completely ducked the fact that the original image just shows a few white pixels in a row, completely incapable of showing any details of a "bio station" even if that's what it really is. But since those pixels are consistent with the cosmic ray explanation and the "details" in the Google Mars version contains easily identifiable imaging artifacts from processing those pixels, there just isn't any need for bizarre explanations. In that case, a second image showing nothing unusual should come as no surprise, not taken as evidence of "government cover-ups."