Intriguing information in FBI affidavit

I don't know if this is known. To me it was new ...

Re-reading a FBI-affidavit that was written in the morning of September 12, 2001 in Portland I came across two very intriguing pieces of information that completely contradict everything the FBI has said publicly since September 14, 2001.


"A review of the public database for Al Omari has determined that his adress is reported as 4032 57th terrace, Vero Beach, Florida."
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit11.htm

Excuse me. « A review of the public database for Al Omari » didn’t « determine » that ha lived in Hollywood as stated by the FBI on September 14 http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/091401hj.htm
and on September 27
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm
No, “ review of the public database for Al Omari” didn’t come up with the address of Abdulaziz Al Omari, the “official hijacker”, but with the exact address of Abdul Rahman Al Omari!
Please keep in mind that the very same affidavit also mentions the items found in Atta’s two bags that didn’t make the connection flight in Boston.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit10.htm
So even if according to the FBI Al Omari was listed with the first name Abdul
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit10.htm
on the flight manifest the total error of the FBI can hardly be explained as they were in possession of Al Omari’s passport.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing7/9-11Commission_Hearing_2004-01-26.htm

How come that a apparently objective search of the public database lead to Abdul Rahman instead of Abdul Aziz? Why did it lead to Abdul Rahman on the very same day when Ameer and Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Kamfar (all from Vero Beach like Abdul Rahman) were considered to have been the hijackers of 911?

For further information on the story of Abdul Rahman and the Bukharis please read the threads: “Meet the four unknown hijackers” and “Abdulatif Al Omari”.


And for everybody who still desperately tries to find something that might explain this “error” let’s turn to the next piece of intriguing information we find in this affidavit:

"Alomari had listed two vehicles as authorized to park in his parking space. One of this vehicles is registered to Atta.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit11.htm
and
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit12.htm

In case the fact that the hijacker Al Omari was from Vero Beach was some kind of “error” how come then that Atta had a parking place in Vero Beach?
And how come it was never explained? Neither the “mix up” with Abdul Rahman nor Atta’s presence in Vero Beach (which btw is never mentioned in media accounts).
And how come that neither the FBI, nor the Joint Inquiry nor the Independent Commission ever talked of Vero Beach?

Either the FBI affidavit (the agent had sworn that it was true what he had written) or the official account is wrong.
And seeing what was all up in Vero Beach it seems that the FBI affidavit tells the truth and that the official story that nothing was going on in Vero Beach and that Abdul Rahman from Vero Beach was not the hijacker but Abdulaziz from Hollywood (who had never been to Vero Beach nor had any connection to Vero Beach)is completely BS!