911: Col. George Nelson is interviewed by Dave vonKleist

911: Col. George Nelson is interviewed by Dave vonKleist

http://911verses.com/underground/

2005-04-27_Joyce_Riley_and_Dave_vonKleist_Interview_Col_George_Nelson.MP3

For those of us lacking big file and audio capabilities, can you tell us what the discussion is about? Thanks.

Some things posted indicate it would take an hour to download.

It is the best thing that ever happened to me, in terms of home computers.

Really, if you can possibly afford it, it is so very worth it.

:(

suggests that the official 911 story is a complete lie.

He's a pod man...

Like, Morgan Reynolds is a potential pod man and it's still interesting because he's a Bush admin member saying inside job.

Similarly, who is Nelson? Colonel won't do. How is he identified on the show? If he's a high-up decorated air force guy saying these things, if he worked with NORAD or whatever, it automatically carries more credibility.

In general, it's nice when people describe a few salient items about the link they post, instead of asking others simply to click. Needn't be long, just who what when where, but specifics. Thanks.

Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity - The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view.
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Any 9/11 site that does not include Paul Thompson's Timeline in its links is extremely suspect to me.

What's Thompson's timeline have to do with the a trained military aircraft mechanic who spent considerable professional time inspecting crash sites to obtain serial numbers?

not much ...

but after reading the linked article, i looked around the entire site. i wanted to see what other 9/11 research sites they deemed worthy of linking to.

i was pretty surprised to not see paul's Timeline or a link to ccr. why would there not be a link?

(1) they don't know the timeline exists or (2) they know it exists, but they don't think it's important enough to include.

i have a hard time believing (1), so I can only assume (2) is true.

and anyone in the 9/11 research community who doesn't believe paul's timeline is a valuable resource isn't worth my time. and i would question the sincerity of their quest for the truth about 9/11 and their desire to educate others.

Can't quite follow your "let's throw the baby out with the bath water" approach. Norton doesn't dictate their policies. Sheesh.

He has an agenda and he intentionally misrepresents data at times to support his theories (and sell videos).

Colonel George Nelson is the interviewee. Von Kleist is immaterial.