Brady bonds,Durham Family Trust,Cantor-Fitzgerald,ONI and 911

Sioux City, Iowa -- July 25, 2005 -- TomFlocco.com -- According to leaked documents from an intelligence file obtained through a military source in the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), on or about September 12, 1991 non-performing and unauthorized gold-backed debt instruments were used to purchase ten-year "Brady" bonds. The bonds in turn were illegally employed as collateral to borrow $240 billion--120 in Japanese Yen and 120 in Deutsch Marks--exchanged for U.S. currency under false pretenses; or counterfeit and unlawful conversion of collateral against which an unlimited amount of money could be created in derivatives and debt instruments.

The illegal transactions are also linked to the murder of a U.S. Army colonel charged with overseeing approximately 175 secret CIA bank accounts, according to the officer’s wife, Mrs. V. K. Durham. During multiple interviews, Durham told TomFlocco.com that Bush 41 and Clinton administration officials visited her husband Colonel Russell Hermann several times in the months prior to and three days before his torture and murder on August 29, 1994.

Durham told us the $240 billion in stolen currency was obtained resulting from George H. W. Bush’s presidential abuse of power, when he authorized former Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady and former Secretary of State James Baker III to make fraudulent use of the Durham Family Trust collateral without her permission. There is evidence that Colonel Hermann’s and V. K. Durham’s signatures were forged on a Goldman-Sachs bank account certification requesting the conversions to U.S. currency.

The money was never repaid since the ten-year Brady bonds--purchased before September 13, 1991 using the fraudulent collateral and gold bullion as security came due on September 12, 2001--the day after the 9.11 attacks, having allegedly been underwritten and held by the trustee, Cantor-Fitzgerald bond brokerage firm .

Moreover, Durham alleges from conversations before her husband’s murder, that any 10-year Brady bond payoff for notes due on 9-12-2001 would have led to additional evidence of trillions in stolen funds from the U.S. Treasury and the identity of the perpetrators--providing an important reason to take out Cantor-Fitzgerald offices in the North Tower and a Pentagon ONI file section on September 11. Besides the intelligence file leaked to Durham, other documents were obtained by TomFlocco.com from whistleblower Stewart Webb’s intelligence sources.

more...http://tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=112&mode=&order=0&thold=0

n/t

You know how everyone bewares gatekeepers? Well, Flocco's a GATEWAY for any distraction that comes along. And "federal whistleblower" Stew Webb has been playing the same role for a dozen years or more.

This is like the tenth story I've seen that attributes 9/11 to an obscure financial machination. As though insurance fraud was the prime motive and the collaborating elements within the U.S. military and intel apparatus were just unwitting tools. (And the U.S. admin just happened to be planning a few wars that wouldn't have been possible without 9/11.)

The other day there was one going around AFPN about how a few traders at Cantor Fitzgerald were going to expose the great lie of the Kyoto Treaty and had to be eliminated by the evil-environmentalist Club of Rome types, etc. Then there's the old NESARA chestnut (Sept. 11 would have seen the revelation of the "NESARA Act" restoring constitutional government and a hard currency, so the one-worlders had to act fast to prevent it.)

Can't we just concentrate on what's surface-obvious? Did these secret financial overlords have the power to plan the 9/11 wargames, get Rumsfeld, Myers, Bush, Mies and Winfield to make themselves scarce at just the right moment, inform the "hijackers" (or program the remote control) to fly into no-primary radar zones, shoot down UA 93, etc. etc.? If the goal was to take out Cantor Fitzgerald, wouldn't a bomb have been simpler?

And oh, by the way, didn't Cantor and every other financial institution resume business soon after 9/11/01, such that the bonds would have been due whatever the incidental carnage in New York?

This is similar to the post-JFK denial theories that tried to pin it all on some private beast (the mafia, this or that corporation, Ari Onassis), obscuring the reality that elements at Pentagon and CIA colluded with allied private interests to execute the President in public, kill the patsy on TV, and cover everything up in an in-your-face fashion.

Goldfinger...

Just posted this to get some viable rebuttals. You know...let's air out the bed sheets to see if they stink. Thanks for your post.

Though I have no plausible response to the bonds still being on record after 911, I can safely say that there was a more complex motive to destroying the towers than Cantor-Fitzgerald including two obvious ones...the insurance scam that you mentioned and the deeply imbeded psych-op effect on the masses.

two wars for oil (and opium) already planned and ready to go, justifying a new apparatus of domestic repression, mobilizing the population in a time of great crisis, and pumping a few hundred billion dollars into the war and security industries when they need it badly.

Even the insider trading skeptics constantly emphasize is important because it shows foreknowledge and presumably leads us back to actual planners somewhere down the information chain.

All this speaks to something far greater than this or that lone scam, and to perpetrators who have the biggest possible picture in mind and know they can rely on media and government cover-ups. Only people in key positions of govt. or who can control those positions can even contemplate mounting such an operation.

You have to look at the people actually in a position to "do" the air defense circumvention, the FBI investigative blockage, the suppression of forewarnings, the warnings to select VIPs, the subsequent cover-up. They may be under someone else's control, but they're the ones we can actually show were either involved, or taken out of the loop by those who were.

I quite understand your approach to the matter,Jack,and it is a very good one. But there are other angles including the possibilty of uncovering the money trail and coming up with solid physical,circumstantial, and photographic evidence. We should all just work together to uncover this and as I was just thinking now we should do it in the light of the great gift of life and its accompaning spirituality. More power to you. Tim

240 billion dollars is hardly your typical "loan scam"

Rumsfeld Buries Admission of Missing 2 Trillion Dollars in 9/10/01 Press Conference
http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html


And about a billion in missing gold,etc. from WTC4 as well.

The money guys playing around with billions and trillions play a game we may not understand.

There were some big money transfers due to 9/11.
enough to hire a few people for various desired tasks.
But why haven't some of the big losers objected?

Like some of the insurence companies.

We're probably looking at MANY scams going - the question is how many of them were being done in the knowledge that a major transformative moment was on the way that would allow thieves to get away with it?

that conveniently obscured up a great many financial scams (particularly in the government), and clearly not all of them directly connect to the planners.

For instance, it seems as though Larry Silverstein benefited from 9/11. But is there any real way to connect him to the attacks? Does anyone think he was in on the plot? What about Marvin Bush, who was in charge of WTC security-- does anyone think he was really in on the plot?

is another big plus here; but that doesn't implicate any single one of the firms under investigation who were relieved to have these investigations delayed or in many cases no doubt killed.

I think the perps had the biggest picture in mind: preventing an imminent financial collapse on Wall Street and of the federal government (2 trillion missing!) with distraction and bailouts, freeing resources for war to grab resources and repression to keep "peace" at home, making the move to force as the ultimate determinant of what happens in the world. A coup d'etat on the zeitgeist is the ultimate motive. Slicing through the Gordian knot of late capitalist crisis.

Direct profiteers from the events are on the sidelines, some working from foreknowledge (like in the famous trades and last-second money transfers, like almost certainly the owners of the WTC complex), others taking advantage when it happens, whether or not they suspect what really happened.

But the ones we have most directly implicated are the wargames/air defense circumvention planners and chain of command. Find out who re-scheduled the Global Guardian exercises from October to September and you have one end of the perp string in hand.

the Pakistani ISI chief Ahmed, who in turn received it from the Pentagon. But obviously the big question is who in the Pentagon scheduled it?

I happen to think "Atta" was just some hijacker who discovered he wasn't actually flying the plane once he took over the cockpit, and that Ahmed was doing little more than arranging patsies, but who cares what any of us "think"? What's more interesting, as you say, is who scheduled and coordinated the wargames that made all this possible in the first place.

Somebody pointed out that 9/11 spiked the stock markets down, so that
by the time the ENRON and Worldcom and Tyco scandals came out people
were too shell-shocked to react, so 9/11 in some ways acted as a
pre-emptive strike to protect the stock market.

2 trillion missing. Right: "How can you talk about money at a time like
this?"

Before 9/11 I was hardly alone in thinking the market was about to spike down and open a major economic crisis.

But the inevitable moment of free-fall was instead blamed on Osama. The government could demand restraint for patriotic reasons. They pumped tens of billions into bailouts and launched the "new new economy" (more war, more security and surveillance, TIA/chips for your arm, etc.) They were able to cover up corruption and plunder ops that amounted to a hundred Enrons or more.

Once again, this suggests 9/11 was engineered with a very big picture in mind. It's not that the entire search, destroy and plunder economy would have necessarily unravelled in the fall of 2001, but someone wanted to gain more control against that possibility, for years to come.

It's unlikely the operative masterminds were out to cover any one scam or achieve any single goal. They were out to transform the whole society, and obviously they've succeeded to a great extent, though it's unclear whether they got everything they wanted because we can't say with certainty who they were. At any rate, I would expect a few Machiavellian philosophers and True Believers with a sense of Global Mission among them.

To find out, I think we must follow back from the wargames operatives and those speculators and operatives who demonstrate direct and detailed foreknowledge (like the put option buyers).

their corporate allies.

Silverstein...........and the buildings were crumbling on the facade(sp?)...would cost more than they were worth to fix.....I don't remember where I read that....I have read so much 911 stuff...sorry