question - plane crash in chicago and pentagon plane

2Design

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:40 PM
Original message

question - plane crash in chicago and pentagon plane

as I look at the plane crash in chicago - I again wonder how the suppose plane that hit the pentagon made on single hole through the building - nothing about the wings or tail or other stuff - still does not add up for me?????

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

NanceGreggs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message

1. You're not alone ...

... that story doesn't add up for a lot of us!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Jara sang

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message

2. It wasn't a plane

It was a cruise missile or small jet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

meunier33

(20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message

3. Where is that info...

About the surplus Navy ASW jets that were being converted into target drones in secrecy in Colorado? I thought it was established from analyzing the picture of the engine in the Pentagon that one of them was used.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SheilaT

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message

4. The plane in Chicago

simply slid off the end of the runway. It would not disintegrate completely going through a chain link fence. It was traveling relatively slowly -- I'm going to guess no more than 50mph and perhaps even slower -- by the time it hit the fence. The plane that hit the Pentagon was traveling at about 400-500 mph when it hit a solid masonry building.

The two accidents are entirely different.

Sliding off the end of the runway happens fairly often. The plane is trying to come to a stop but can't for some reason or another, usually icy runways. Typically these accidents cause relatively little damage, although that's not always the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

uppityperson

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. Yup, ever see a magician whip a tablecloth off a table with dishes on it?

physics
:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

andino

(668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4

6. I would like to add that the Pentagon is a bunker!

Reinforced bunker.

They built it to withstand attacks. And it did a good job of that IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

2Design

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #4

10. yes one was going slowly but when you look at the size of the plane

it just is so much bigger and wider than that hole

sorry, I just don't believe the lies, at least I call them lies. But like Howard dean, I don't always have the accepted viewpoint - but may have the accurate one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

peacetalksforall

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message

7. Anyone who can do some math knows that the Pentagon incident is a

serious lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LARED

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. Can do some math?

How does math tell us it's a lie?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

peacetalksforall

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #8

9. Height of tail, width of wing span, nose height, height of building, size

of opening in the wall, depth of damage into the building, depth of hole into the ground outside the wall, air speed, amount of debris, etc, etc. Combine that with many other funny things and their account of what happened and you have NO B757. According to their story, the Pentagon 'ate' the aircraft. They may have used one of their new toys such as a disintegrator. Or perhaps the B757 is sitting in the Pentagon basement?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Sweet Pea

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-10-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. What's a "disintegrator"? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

peacetalksforall

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Dec-11-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #11

12. I was being 'creative'. But, anything is possible if you know a little

about HAARP and their ability to fly large aircraft remotely and their psy-ops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MercutioATC

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Dec-12-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #9

13. Want some explanations for theose questions? Look here: (plenty of math)

http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kevin Fenton

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Dec-12-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #9

14. How deep was the hole?

"depth of hole into the ground outside the wall"
I've never seen a figure for this. Have you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

petgoat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Dec-12-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #14

15. How deep? Here's a wild guess.

As deep as is necessary to make the numbers jibe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MrSammo1

(788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Dec-12-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message

16. The question you should really be asking is

What really happened at the Pentagon that day?

And in the days that followed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.