How to Spot COINTELPRO Agents

I found this blog very interesting and informative as food for thought when you are on forums

as some might remember I did one on :

"The Process of Brainwashing, Psychological Coercion, and Thought Reform"


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2334414

here is a little snippet>>>>>>>>from her blog.

"Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:

1) To disrupt the agenda
2) To side-track the discussion
3) To interrupt repeatedly
4) To feign ignorance
5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.


Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ....

1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)
2) Print flyers in English only.
3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.
4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support
5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.
6) Confuse issues.
7) Make the wrong demands.
8) Compromise the goal.
9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone's time.
The agent may accompany the endless discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow down the activist's work."

There is much more to site from the article so please read with a grain of salt
and awareness.


http://laura-knight-jadczyk.blogspot.com/2006/01/how-to-spot-cointelpro-agents.html

But I'm not an agent I swear! ;)

I just listed those to drag readers in.


But I didn't list the real meat of the matter
for it is a long article.

It is something that activist should read
for their own awareness and not being just paranoid though conscious on manipulation. Counter intelligence technics
I have personally witnessed in my life, You 'll have to take me on my word on that


I go to many sites and forums besides DU
for example "Above Top Secret" is mentioned and analyzed at her blog
which I do read sometimes with a grain of salt.

Rense is also mention as a confusion disinformation site.

...but I can't quite remember who it is.

That's gonna bug me.
I feel like the A.N.S.W.E.R. is right in front of me.......

I suggest that your answer might have it's problems with this.

I'll have to be weary of the kids running the high school car wash and up-and-comming rock bands.

instead of poor people on the street!
4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support

It really doesn't matter if the guy screwing up the signs is an agent or not, it just matters that he's screwing up the signs. Take him off the signs.

Is that the person who is sure others in the group arepolice agents, and the person who uses the most imflammarory language, and the person who urges the wildest actions, are those most likely to be actual provocateurs....

"Revolution is not a tea party."

Everyone can draw their own conclusions

And I can think of whole organizations that have all the problems mentioned.

Some have traced down for example " Above Top Secrets" iep to government or an Langley Va. area

But you are right on whole organizations having problems.

:)

Seriously, similar the Magistrate said upthread, they are usually the first to point fingers and accuse others of being counter-revolutionaries, so to speak.

Irony-frickin-squared!!!!

This is CRAP! Total BS!!!!

If I had my tinfoil hat on, I might suspect that the subject at hand
might have hit abit too close to home for the mod who moved this.

But I don't, so I won't. Because that would be WRONG.

But, is mention in the article, but so were so many other things of interests
Anyway, I think it is an article worth viewing, especially on "Beyond Top Secret"
which I had just read their rebuttal of the Pentagon crash, which I found interesting when I came upon
this article researching the crash.

Sorta fits part of the article on what happen.

I knew it wouldn't last long in GDP because it was controversial on agent provocateurs at DU.
However you can do a"site meter" analysis on DU and find that the government watches
or at least someone using a government iep is watching this site on
SUNDAY at 11:30 pm pacific standard time. It doesn't say who, only the percentage.
vs normal retail iep's such as verizon, comcast, etc.
It's around 1%-5% depending on the time of day and traffic flow at DU.










Here is a link to site meter, which is a pay service.
http://sitemeter.sitetoolbox.com/website.php

I couldn't figure out why they were beyond the pale.

There should be an inspector general of moderators who spot checks stuff that's deleted or moved.

I attended a little workshop on 'movement security' that was really good, and we got lots of
good literature about it. Much of it came from Political Research Associates who can be found
at

http://www.publiceye.org

If you're looking for that literature, do searches on 'movement security'.

would do it, or even googling the person.