While I was looking for something else I came across this article "Live Coverage of 9/11".
It's a short article but contains some pretty explosive information:
* * * *
To have live video coverage of 9/11 including the moment when the first plane hit the first WTC tower, you had to have someone who knew it was going to happen and had videocams in place. No?
Interesting discussion overheard on a radio talk show last night. The guest was David Ray Griffin, professor emeritus of religion and philosophy, who has written books about 9/11 challenging the official version -- to say the least. He believes the Administration was involved.
Whether you or I believe that or not, a caller to the show provided a very interesting piece of the puzzle about Bush's "pet goat" moments in Florida on 9/11. The caller identified himself as a retired NASA employee in Florida. He said that NASA is increasingly involved in spying and security and implied that one is as likely to bump into someone from an intelligence agency in the hallways of NASA as someone working directly for NASA.
The morning of 9/11, he was working at one of NASA's consoles, with video monitor on, when the attacks happened. The first plane hitting WTC came over live -- live -- on his monitor. That means, he said, that someone or some group knew 9/11 was going to happened and was videotaping it and feeding it to the intelligence network. He added that the same transmission could well have been piped into the President's limo in Florida as it sped towards the elementary school. The attack would have been seen -- live -- by President Bush.
* * * *
http://prairieweather.typepad.com/big_blue_stem/2006/02/live_coverage_o.htmlI did a search to see if this article had been discussed but didn't see it.
Anybody else hear about this?