OMG! CNN Clip of Charlie Sheen Theory on 9/11!

radio4progressives

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:21 PM
Original message

OMG! CNN Clip of Charlie Sheen Theory on 9/11!

Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 01:21 PM by radio4progressives

http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/v...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

radio4progressives

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message

1. self delete test

Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 01:24 PM by radio4progressives

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

radio4progressives

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message

2. Just to add that this is a program on CNN Showbiz and archived on website!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ellenfl

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message

3. kick for later! eom

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TomInTib

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message

4. Thanks for the post...

I have wanted to see that.

I know a lot of people involved in major demolition projects (stadiums, bridges, tall buildings) and not a single one believes those weren't controlled demos.

But I have also seen posts here on DU explaining how, theoretically, the official version could be legitimate. I also know how misleading a person armed with a degree in engineering versus real life experience can be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cessna Invesco Palin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. I'm curious.

It sounds as if you're talking to people who actually do demolition. Preparation for controlled demolition is a horribly invasive thing to do to a building. How did they suggest that this was done while the buildings were occupied, without anybody noticing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

flyarm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. there were several floors in both buildings that were empty and the

security dogs and security was vastly washed down for 2 weeks prior to 9/11..

connect dots..and follow the money!

fly

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cessna Invesco Palin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Do you have cites for any of this? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

radio4progressives

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5

8. It would have to be prepared over a period of time, i suppose..

but that isn't exactly impossible...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Ferry Fey

(289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8

10. Legit demolition firms in the real world bear responsibility

"Preparation for controlled demolition is a horribly invasive thing to do to a building."

Only when you are taking legal responsibilities for the consequences of anything going wrong and possible injuries to person or property. Let alone having financial needs dictate that as little rubble should need to be moved afterward as possible.

If you are not accountable for the consequences, you can do it fast and dirty. "What can we do to minimise dust and debris contamination of lower Manhattan, and make sure nobody gets hurt?" would not have been the thoughts guiding a placement of charges during the "power down" that the buildings experienced just before 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cessna Invesco Palin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #10

11. No. It doesn't work that way.

You have to strip the interior down to the steel and concrete to position the charges, run the cord, etc. You can't just throw a bunch of explosives around the interior and expect it to fall down. If you'll remember, that was tried in 1993.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Chiyo-chichi

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11

13. But...

you CAN slam a 737 into the upper floors and they will fall down?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cessna Invesco Palin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-24-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #13

16. How are these things even remotely related?

And they weren't 737s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Chiyo-chichi

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Mar-24-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #16

17. My bad. 767-200s.

I took your point to be that it is not easy to bring down buildings like the twin towers. My point is that you are quite right. They were designed to survive an impact and resulting fires from a collision by the largest commercial aircraft at the time, a Boeing 707-340, which was only slightly smaller than the planes that hit them on 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mikelewis

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5

15. The buildings were being re-wired for a new Fire Alarm system...

it was being installed by a company named Securacom. During that time, the building's security and surveillance had been shut down on several occasions. It is possible that this was the time when the explosives were planted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MrSammo1

(788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4

12. Do you know if any of these people........

are willing to come out a speak?

I know an Internet show that would love to have them on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

OmmmSweetOmmm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message

9. If it just makes a hundred people question, it is well worth it! Thank

you for providing the link!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Humor_In_Cuneiform

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-23-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message

14. Just saw the video on CNN.com and came looking for a thread.

This is good. I tend to agree with Sheen, but either way it is always good to get these things into the open. It often helps to have a celebrity talk about a subject that has been sort of taboo in the past.

Good for Sheen!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.