Interesting photo of Pentagon on day

It's a pdf file from Delaware News Journal, Sept. 11 2001, via archive.org because the original source doesn't seem to have it around anymore. Apologies if this has been seen before but it looks to me like there's a very large piece of plane in this photo.

http://web.archive.org/web/20020830085558/http://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/local/2001/09/pdf/09112001EXTRA2.pdf

All of these images have been available since 9-11 and copies are all over the Internet.

If you are talking about the picture on Page 1, I don't see any pieces of airplane? Maybe you could be more specific? Thanks.

I was referencing the photo of the Pentagon on the first page with all the people standing around. I thought it looked like there was a fairly large piece of plane close to the point of impact. As a matter of interest, assuming it's not a part of the plane, what is it?

Where do you see anything resembling plane wreckage?

I can understand why the shape reminds you of a plane fuselage, but look more closely. That's definately spray from a firehose, not any solid fuselage!

Thanks.

For The Conspiracy Theorist Of Tomorrow





In dedication of the top anti-terrorism expert of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, John O'Neill

I just got it about the hijackers being drug dealers. Duh!



Oh yes, life makes a bit more sense now.

I know it's very long and extensive, however I haven't felt this good about any theory as this one. This one is solid as a rock.

They are bunch of criminals, however they have set up a strong system. It'll take time to knock it down.

Did you see the little details that Paul Bremer was CEO of Terrorism Inc. (the shadow part of Marsh). That means that a terrorist was send to Iraq. No wonder, it became such a mess.

It's a lot for a first read. Yet I feel confident that 9/11 will be solved. Most of it already is...

and not a single water line going anywhere? Yet there's all sorts of equipment just sitting in a 'staging' area.

I think that is the real story behind the Pentagon.
Here is a volunteer fireman describing the situation that day. He believes the official story, but you can tell that someone didn't want people to be rescued or the fire to go out.

http://pentagon.spacelist.org/

aircraft they flew in wouldn't leave the kind of smoke a regular airplane would, so they needed the smoke created from the diesel generator to "pick up the slack."

More likely a missile system dressed up to look like a generator. One more reason to burn it down. Needed to get rid of the evidence. BTW: It points directly at the impact point and someone was nice enough to push the fence down in front of it.

not to damage the lawn.

that the Value Jet and the passengers that crashed into the Everglades were recovered?

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/103-09102005-539399.html

Only about 650 pounds of human remains, just 8 percent of the total the people on board would have weighed, were collected - leaving little traditional pathology work to do, Miller says.

I'd venture that when they estimated that 95% was recovered in the article you linked, they meant 95% of what they felt could be reasonably recovered. Wouldn't you agree?

No, I wouldn't agree with your suggestion. It sounds like Crowley is being pretty clear. He released an inventory of recovered pieces of the plane, and the statement of "95% of the downed aircraft" speaks for itself.

Let's see it please.

My point was - someone who says 95% of the downed aircraft has been recovered and releases an inventory of recovered pieces...

...must mean that 95% of the airplane was recovered, not that 95% of what could reasonable be recovered has been.

Mr. Miller said shortly after going to the site of an alleged airliner crash that "there wasn't even a drop of blood to be found anywhere".

How can there be 650 pounds of human remains, but not one drop of blood?

Walking in his gumboots, the only recognisable body part he saw was a piece of spinal cord, with five vertebrae attached.

"I've seen a lot of highway fatalities where there's fragmentation," Miller said. "The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven't, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high, so all of that material just got vaporised."

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/09/09/1031115990570.html

Miller goes on to say that the search effort recovered 270k of human remains. So although finding no blood is remarkable to him, he doesn't find it so unusual that he can't recognize actual human remains.

No blood and no credible evidence of a plane crash (not even one piece of luggage, much less two large engines). Makes it all that much more likely that what Mr. Gumboots found was body parts that were planted at the non-crash site (blasted-out hole in the ground). Furthermore, Mr. "Gumboots" Miller doesn't say where he found all those bloodless body parts. They could have come from anywhere. Look UP in the sky!

Tell me more. I find the words flowing from your keyboard fascinating.

Especially things made of metal. That requires a fire that burns for more then a few seconds. Fireballs are quite spectacular but not as damaging as you would think. It the fire after the explosion that causes most of the damage and that depends on how long it takes to put out. Most accounts of Flight 93 claim plowed into the ground and exploded on impact, but the fire only lasted 5 or 10 minutes. Certainly not long enough to cause the plane to vaporize and the parts that burned when they plowed under the ground would have been smothered by the dirt.


This may or may not relate but here's an example of a fire ball that I had direct experience with and the fire from this one burnt for a couple of hours.





I happened to be living at the marina next door the day this happened. My ex SO and I were driving back when we could see smoke coming up from the marina, so of course the first thought was that we hoped it wasn't our boat. When we got there we found out that a fire had started down on the oil dock on the other side of canal. Apparently a fuel truck was transfering fuel to one of the big storage tanks and a spark set off a fire. Fortunately, the guys at the oil dock all managed to jump into the water and were picked up by boaters before the fire caused the tank to explode. My ex SO was a bit of a maniac and decided to run down to see the fire better. I hung back near the exit from the marina. Then the damn thing blew. The thing just kept getting bigger and bigger and I finally realized maybe I should start running. Has I ran I could feel the heat on my back. A lot of people decided it was a good time to go swimming, expecially the folks closer to the end of the dock across from the explosion. The amazing thing was that there wasn't as much damage as you would expect. The oil dock was toast but the fire did burn for another couple of hours before they finished putting it out. The end of the dock of the marina was fine and the mangroves on the other side were singed but didn't catch fire. Even the other oil tanks that were next to the explosion survived. Yet, if you had been near the fireball when it went off, you wouldn't think anything could have survived.

First he said that anything was possible in terms of a shootdown and that they hadn't ruled out anything.

The very next press conference, he said that there's no way the government had anything to do with anything without presenting any evidence.

At least he admits that there was a second 'debris' site. However, his explaination for it doesn't make sense. He claims only light material blew to this other spot, things that 'in the air with wind would easily blown'. What wind? There was even a breeze at the crash site. Plus if the plane didn't explode until it hit the ground and then plowed into the earth, how did enough debris get airborne to create another debris site?

Is he related to Ari Fleisher by chance? :sarcasm:

http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html

...spotless...

Umm, this picture is CGIed, right?

getting to the Pentagon across the lawn. Of course it looks burned NEXT to the fire.


Are you blind? Or just have convenient vision? Don't bother to reply- we already know the answer.

Maybe this is where they developed the amazing PentaLawn from the amazing ValueSwamp. Which is of course proof that it's all a conspiracy - is it a coincidence that two planes on 9/11 crashed into places with PentaLawn??

Okay...

If 911 was a covert U.S. operation, it's hard to imagine that no one would have warned the Olsons about flying (commercial) on 911. That's why what happened to Mrs. Olson may well be one of the only true examples of a 911 coincidence, albeit a tragic, sad one.

I see three possibilities;

1. She's not dead.
2. Ted Olson was in on it but didn't tell his wife.
3. Ted Olson wasn't in on it and couldn't tell his wife.

I don't give much credence to the third one I'm afraid. And the first one is only a remote possibility. Therefore I tend to go with #2. So the question would be why didn't he tell his wife?

He would if they were still together wouldn't he?

She looks a lot like Barbara. Nothing a little plastic surgery can't fix these days. Plus, he 'remarried' within a year of Barbara's death. Seems it didn't take long for him to get over his 'grief'.

I would be interested.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4103885


I saw a pic of them together at some ceremony but I can't put my hands on it at the moment but she looked a lot like Barbara down to the long blond hair. Must be a 'thing' of his?

and I can't find any confirmation that Olsen has indeed remarried. Lot's of talk on the internet blogs, but nothing like an official announcement or news report that I can find.

I still remember seeing a picture of him with his 'family' at someone's funeral, maybe Reagan's? He was standing to the left side at an outdoor service, with his new wife and one of his granddaughters.

I've been looking for it for a while now.

http://www.washingtonian.com/capital_comment/2006/PowerPlayers/02.html

Some four years after his wife, author Barbara Olson, was killed on the hijacked American Airlines flight that crashed into the Pentagon, former solicitor general Ted Olson is engaged. He will be married this fall to Lady Evelyn Booth, who has been his social companion since they met at the Kentucky Derby in 2002.

(At the bottom of the page)

Theres a good photo of her on this page, about half way down.

https://infamia3.securesites.net/issues/2005-02/taste_stars/index.php

Also Helgi Walker who is in that photo as well, might have been his date at times too.

They're getting married on October 21 at Meadowood Napa Valley in St. Helena, California.

<edited for spelling>