Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What DECADE was * in?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:21 PM
Original message
What DECADE was * in?
BUSH: Let me see where to start here.

First, the National Journal named Senator Kennedy the most
liberal senator of all. And that’s saying something in that bunch.
You might say that took a lot of hard work.


Kennedy? Kennedy Did that dipshit think he was Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes that line was just nasty, I thought he was a cowpoke. It was the spur
he had in his mouth, which is why he can't talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't believe he's still spewing that crap
after it's been proven to be completely false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. and that Dred-Scott decision...that one really floored me.....

bush* is brain-damaged AND dangerous....comes from his first 45 years of heavy heavy drinking and drugging....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That, in Bushspeak...
... is an invitation for all blacks to join the Republican Party.... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Attracting blacks....didn't do a good job tonight!
If he was so damned concerned in attracting blacks, why weren't there more in the audience? I don't recall seeing many Asians there either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This was supposedly undecided voters...
... so I would guess that those groups have pretty much already made up their minds.... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe.
There is always a fringe of voters who may not have decided....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC