Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Portland Oregonian Endorses Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:32 PM
Original message
Portland Oregonian Endorses Kerry
Source: Kerry-Edwards 2004

PORTLAND – Adding to the incredible momentum continuing to build for the Kerry-Edwards ticket in Oregon, the Oregonian, Oregon’s only statewide daily paper, will carry an official endorsement of John Kerry for President in its Sunday edition.

Among the reasons the paper gives for its turnaround from a 2000 endorsement of Bush are Bush’s mishandling of the war in Iraq and his misguided fiscal policies, which have put the nation on precarious financial footing. The paper also cites Kerry’s demonstrated experience on domestic issues and ability to repair the damage done by Bush on the international front.

A Survey USA poll taken after Friday’s presidential debate shows Oregonians largely agree with the Oregonian. Respondents overwhelming support John Kerry for President, choosing Kerry over Bush 47% to 38%.

Excerpts from the endorsement:

On Kerry:
“A long record of public service shows that he possesses a deep, nuanced understanding of the central domestic issues of our time.”

“Kerry also has demonstrated, through is personal heroism in Vietnam and his positions in this campaign, that he is strong, aggressive and thoughtful enough to perform well as commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces.”

“On the international front, Kerry understands something that Bush does not: Our nation’s experience shows that strong international alliances are vital to erecting a bulwark against aggression, tyranny and terrorism.”

On Bush:
“When George W. Bush took office in a deeply divided nation, he promised to reach out to unite the country. If anything, he has helped make the rifts deeper. That may be his real failure as president. John Kerry can do better.”

On Bush’s conduct of the war in Iraq: “They chose ideology over expertise. This arrogance led to a series of military, political and diplomatic blunders and, we believe, resulted in the unnecessary deaths of many brave Americans.”

On Bush’s failed fiscal policy: “The White House and leaders in Congress have failed to fully acknowledge the threat posed by the giant deficits that the current recipe of tax cuts and profligate federal spending has brewed. Addressing this will not be as simple as paying for tax cuts through spending cuts.”

The link tomorrow: http://oregonlive.com/editorials/oregonian/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. They said "nuanced"!
:bounce: in a good way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent
I bet we will see lots of papers which went for the chimp in 2000 reverse themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. The O has taken so much hell for that 2000 endorsement.
It's good to see them admit their mistake, but
then again I'm thinking IT'S ABOUT FREAKING TIME.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmooses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is Good News Here In Oregon
The Oregonian is paper owned by conservatives and supported Bush in 2000:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cool
That really puts the endorsement in amazing perspective. Thanks for the good news, all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I'll be dipped in dogshit
I sure didn't call that shot- although my guess is that the Oregonian is just going with the flow. As I've said many, may times, Oregon is not and never was a "battleground state." Kerry enjoys a comfortable lead- and subtract the Nader vote of over 5.5% in 2000, and Gore won handily too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. About danged time!
I couldn't believe it when the Oregonian endorsed Bush in 2000. I was relieved that the state went for Gore, but then along came Florida. And SCOTUS. And then there's the last four years of misery and chaos.

Might consider re-subscribing to the Oregonian now that they have acknowledged in black and white the clear differences between Bush and Kerry, articulating Bush's failed policies and endorsing Kerry.

Now we must do our part:

DEFEAT BUSH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Would somebody mind calling the White House
and telling them not to bother with the trip to Oregon next week. It's such a bother and I'm sure the weather will be better in Crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Spouse and I were just discussing this this morning
I was vacillating between "I'll bet the right-wing publisher MAKES them suck up to Chimp again" and "Even they wouldn't dare endorse Shrub again."

Well, whaddya know. They actually came down on the side of goodness. Color me somewhat pleasantly surprised.

Letters to the editor are running 5 or 6 for Kerry to one against Dumbass Dubya (according to their own totals).

I still can't figure out why they endorsed that extremist wingnut Goli Ameri over David Wu, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. That POS David Reinhard,
their resident lapdog, must be really pissed and probably had to be sedated. bwah hah hah. Ballots will soon be in the mail here in Oregon so all of the newspapers will be out with their endorsements in the next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. God I hate that guy Reinhard.
I had the misfortune of talking to him on the phone one day. He was the rudest person I've ever encountered. I despise him. He is one of the biggest propagandist around. I doubt he has two brain cells to rub togeher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Reinhard is such a boob,
he just pulls the Rove memos off of his thermofax, crayons his own name at the top, and the Snoregonian runs with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's amazing. I couldn't be more stunned.
Now the Goli Ameri endorsement makes a little more sense. They had to throw the Ameri bone to the freaks in the executive offices to salvage a shred of dignity in the editorial offices.

One DUer (can't remember whom) posted a great letter he had sent to the Ed board regarding the pres endorsement this year. Brilliant, eloquent stuff. It may have helped shame them into doing the right thing this year. It certainly didn't do any harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. On the Ameri endorsement, the big HO shows its true colors
It mentions that one reason to support Ameri is because she supports privatizing (read: destroying) social security. Quite in keeping with their mindset. Plus, they might believe that they actually have a chance of influencing that election. Well, they just did with this voter. I wasn't going to vote for Wu, based on his Medicare betrayal. They've just convinced me otherwise. Nice job, Ms. Rowe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nicely written
other editorial boards should take note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC