Looks like the decision was explicitly made based on strict constructionism, and from that point of view may have been correctly decided.
Bush denies (for whatever it's worth) that he would appoint this kind of judge to the court. He then says he would appoint someone with the same basic philosophy.
*'s reference to Dread Scott was a message to the wingnuts that he will appoint judges who will overturn Roe v Wade. It had nothing to do with Dread Scott. Google it for details.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.